PLEASE NOTE: This blog is a bigotry free zone open to all persons, regardless of age, race, religion, color, national origin, sex, political affiliations, marital status, physical or mental disability, age, or sexual orientation. Further, this blog is open to the broad variety of opinions out there and will not delete any comments based upon point of view. However, comments will be deleted if they are worded in an abusive manner and show disrespect for the intellectual process.

Monday, January 19, 2015

JUDICIARY COMMITTEE MEETING ON THE REAPPOINTMENT OF JUDGES!

Judiciary Committee
PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA
Friday, January 23, 2015
10:30 AM in Room 2C of the LOB

NOMINATIONS FOR REVIEW


I. To be a Judge of the Superior Court:
      
       1. The Honorable Bernadette Conway of North Haven


2. The Honorable Stephen F. Frazzini of West Hartford


3. The Honorable Edward C. Graziani of Ellington


4. The Honorable Earl B. Richards, III of Woodbridge
 
II. To be a State Referee:
      
       1. The Honorable Taggart D. Adams of Wilton


2. The Honorable Elizabeth A. Gallagher of Litchfield


3. The Honorable Arthur A. Hiller of Shelton

III. To be the Chairman of the Board of Pardons & Paroles:
      
       1. Carleton J. Giles of Middletown


IV. To be a member of the Board of Pardons & Paroles:
      
       1. Rufaro N. Berry of Hamden


2. Terry M. Borjeson of Newington


3. Patricia Camp of Bloomfield


4. Joy Chance of Bloomfield


5. Kenneth Ireland of New Britain


6. Jennifer Zaccagnini of Woodbury

2 comments:

  1. Other Important Hearings To Consider Attending:

    An Act To Establish A Patental Rights Advisory Commission: http://cga.ct.gov/2015/TOB/S/2015SB-00661-R00-SB.htm

    An Act Concerning Improving Court Orders:
    http://cga.ct.gov/2015/TOB/S/2015SB-00659-R00-SB.htm

    ReplyDelete
  2. Curiously, during his renomination hearing before the CT Judiciary Committee it came out that Judge Frazzini, who ruled on the CT Law Tribune prior restraint case, as well as the GAL and the mother's attorney were or are all members of AFCC. I wonder if that was disclosed to the parties before the judge ruled?

    ReplyDelete