tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9173416929829483433.post4315840706096650893..comments2024-03-23T22:45:11.889-04:00Comments on Divorce in Connecticut: A RANSOMWARE ATTACK ON THE CT JUDICIAL BRANCH? WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? ONE BLOGGER SPECULATES! Catharine Sloperhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08915766638552096174noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9173416929829483433.post-7661599470900012292018-03-11T12:01:36.242-04:002018-03-11T12:01:36.242-04:00I filed a discrimination complaint in CHRO against...I filed a discrimination complaint in CHRO against Judicial Branch (ADA Title II). Discovered CHRO contracted with Westlaw to electronically surveil me (violating 4th amendment and CT stalking statute). Personally identifiable info updated monthly and stored in CHRO computer connected to Internet. Filed complaint with FTC under Gramm Leach Bliley Act. FTC retained complaint, told me to refer it to CT Attorney-General “for corrective action.” No response from AG, despite query from my state rep’s office. Wrote him again after agency hack, told him I was anxious. Still no response, despite “Joint Task Force on Cyber Security.” If Jud Branch refers anyone to the CHRO after they file a discrimination complaint, Beware.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9173416929829483433.post-49863431405939727402018-03-10T21:47:43.487-05:002018-03-10T21:47:43.487-05:00#GoodbyeAFCC#GoodbyeAFCCAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9173416929829483433.post-41910371542078594952018-03-10T20:52:21.995-05:002018-03-10T20:52:21.995-05:00Seems like a better ransomware target would be the...Seems like a better ransomware target would be the comptroller...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com