tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9173416929829483433.post7545972064217042358..comments2024-03-23T22:45:11.889-04:00Comments on Divorce in Connecticut: BUDLONG & BARRETT USE FAKE AMBER ALERT TO DENY MOTHER ACCESS TO HER CHILD: THE COLLEEN KERWICK STORY, PART VIICatharine Sloperhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08915766638552096174noreply@blogger.comBlogger18125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9173416929829483433.post-39604110071477241512015-05-23T12:13:55.702-04:002015-05-23T12:13:55.702-04:00your comments show who the true ass is your comments show who the true ass is Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9173416929829483433.post-36882717224057035872015-05-18T12:12:27.295-04:002015-05-18T12:12:27.295-04:00This guy is a total "Dirt Bag"! Narcissi...This guy is a total "Dirt Bag"! Narcissist ass who hates women, who's son will only grow to resent his abusive behavior toward his mother. Karma is a bitch, your sons mother; an intelligent, beautiful and loving women became a victim of your vindictive behavior. Shame on you for abusing her, your son and the system. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9173416929829483433.post-47079124474060185382015-05-15T06:36:04.186-04:002015-05-15T06:36:04.186-04:00Hey, why let the facts get in the way of a good st...Hey, why let the facts get in the way of a good story! The woman should be in jail for all her actions based on facts not your ridiculous storytelling.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9173416929829483433.post-73643894336323429982015-05-14T18:21:08.750-04:002015-05-14T18:21:08.750-04:00I get it, not that Colleen did abscond, but that a...I get it, not that Colleen did abscond, but that a doctor said she "might" abscond. So punish the woman for predicted actions, not ones she actually committed. What happened to innocent until proven guilty because the person actually committed the crime. Now I understand why Rep. Vargas said Family Court was like living in North Korea!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9173416929829483433.post-11761284471273809172015-05-14T14:55:38.962-04:002015-05-14T14:55:38.962-04:00Ok, I see that under Item #16 of the December 20, ...Ok, I see that under Item #16 of the December 20, 2013 Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion Regarding the Minor Child's Scheduled Vacation to Arizona With the Plaintiff's Father" under Item #16, it states "Prior to the entry of judgment, the plaintiff father was forced to obtain an ex parte order preventing the defendant mother from traveling outside the United States with the minor child based on Dr. Horowitz's opinion that the defendant mother presented a flight risk and could seek to abscond with the child if she was permitted to leave the country." Of course, and now I am going to speak slowly so you get it: that. is. why. the. father. was. given. the. child's. passport. as. part. of. the. dissolution. agreement. Thus. post judgment. Colleen. Berwick. did. not. have. a. passport. for. the. child. which. was. why. she. could. not. leave. the. country. with. the. child. Plus, it is well known based upon the science that psychologists are not able to predict behavior with any kind of accuracy and so allowing Dr. Horowitz testimony into evidence was probably a violation of the rules of evidence if it was allowed. Anyway, returning to the document, the motion re the vacation to Arizona, there is no mention in this document either of any "long history of mother doing this." If there was such a "long history" you'd think Campbell Barrett would have mentioned it because were it true, but I suspect it is not, that might of been a persuasive point. If this "long history" you reference is as feeble and unsubstantiated as Dr. Horowitz's nonsensical predictions I'm not sure its worth mentioning.Catharine Sloperhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08915766638552096174noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9173416929829483433.post-75237192830008216752015-05-14T14:42:04.517-04:002015-05-14T14:42:04.517-04:00Could you clarify what you mean by "court ord...Could you clarify what you mean by "court ordered documents" because we'd all like to know what you mean by that, or did you just throw the term out for fun. Also, talking about the "long history of mother doing this" could you clarify that as well because no court documents I have seen indicate anything of the kind. The "Plaintiff's Emergency Motion to Suspend Defendant Mother's Access to Minor Child and to Award Temporary Sole Custody to Plaintiff Father" dated December 20, 2013 makes no mention of a prior long history. Catharine Sloperhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08915766638552096174noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9173416929829483433.post-58899316449252549582015-05-14T13:37:25.349-04:002015-05-14T13:37:25.349-04:00If the mother had kidnapped the child, then the Av...If the mother had kidnapped the child, then the Avon police would have issued the Amber Alert which they clearly chose not to do. Your threats simply demonstrate the kind of behavior that was the standard in the Savino v. Savino case about which we are complaining.<br />Catharine Sloperhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08915766638552096174noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9173416929829483433.post-84913699503842720622015-05-14T13:26:38.657-04:002015-05-14T13:26:38.657-04:00The author conveniently avoids the real issue that...The author conveniently avoids the real issue that the Mother kidnapped the child and did not return the child according to court ordered documents. Given the long history of the Mother doing this the proper actions were taken. And, by the way, you can be sued for libel and defamation for slandering someone in a blog-it is called Cyberbullying and it is disgusting. If your so called "facts" were anywhere near correct then the outcome would be very different.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9173416929829483433.post-72586509488991499702015-05-14T01:09:05.755-04:002015-05-14T01:09:05.755-04:00It looks to me that Cathy Sloper is saying that Bu...It looks to me that Cathy Sloper is saying that Budlong & Barrett implied to the Court that an Amber Alert on the child was imminent when they knew that wasn't true. So, in other words, what happened is that Budlong & Barrett lied to the Court which is a violation of their attorney ethics. Attorney ethics require that attorneys show candor to the tribunal or something like that.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9173416929829483433.post-40240330190404405362015-05-14T01:06:04.916-04:002015-05-14T01:06:04.916-04:00Yes, because it's not illegal to tell the trut...Yes, because it's not illegal to tell the truth in a blog, which is exactly what Cathy Sloper has done!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9173416929829483433.post-35454723680386803382015-05-13T19:29:43.177-04:002015-05-13T19:29:43.177-04:00I am clear on the difference between talking to th...I am clear on the difference between talking to the police about an Amber alert and obtaining one in the above blog. What I criticize Budlong & Barrett for is attempting to obtain an Amber Alert for which there was absolutely zero justification, and then implying to the judge in an ex parte motion that they anticipated obtaining an Amber Alert as a means to wrest custody from Colleen Kerwick. It is clear that to apply for an Amber Alert in this case or even to discuss the issue with police, Kenneth Savino had to lie about the facts.Catharine Sloperhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08915766638552096174noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9173416929829483433.post-61110046430972485252015-05-13T17:28:17.566-04:002015-05-13T17:28:17.566-04:00Talking to the police about and Amber Alert and ob...Talking to the police about and Amber Alert and obtaining an actual Amber Alert are two different things. Again there was no Amber Alert issued. I dont know why you insist there was an Amber Alert when nothing of the sort took place. You have been told this in multiple ways and multiple times, but you seem not to understand it and accept this fact. Why? I think you like to stir the pot. Or maybe you just can't make yourself comprehend the facts. In either case your reporting on this case is fictional and not reality. As a journalist you should stick to the facts not what you would like to say. Your reporting on this case has from the start is totally inaccurate. If you were writing for a newspaper you would have been fired by now.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9173416929829483433.post-82184034693273443582015-05-13T15:44:16.241-04:002015-05-13T15:44:16.241-04:00As the self represented attorney at law on this ca...As the self represented attorney at law on this case, I can say with certainty that State Marshall Bruce Kaz (who also testified in the cases of Golli, Baker, Thurber & Morero et al to have children taken away from the parents who were adverse to the attorneys who hired him to serve papers) swore before the court and in an affidavit submitted to the court that he saw a woman with long blonde hair driving a white BMW station-wagon around Avon that day and State Marshall Bruce Kaz also swore that he saw a white BMW station-wagon which he identified as my car parked outside my home in Avon BEFORE he went to the Avon police at the instruction of Atty. Jon Kukucka to meet the party who were trying to get an Amber Alert called on me. The police refused to issue an Amber Alert, but Jon Kukucka proceeded to lie to the court that an Amber Alert was being processed to remove my son from me. I only wish it was a fairy tale, but this was an outrageous scam. I was alerted to this blog by Kenneth Savino and, upon reading it, believe that the author has gotten the majority of the facts correct even if I don't like all of them. Colleen Kerwickhttp://colleenkerwick.infonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9173416929829483433.post-41863346700942484552015-05-13T12:04:48.711-04:002015-05-13T12:04:48.711-04:00Duh.Duh.Catharine Sloperhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08915766638552096174noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9173416929829483433.post-27727650274815553352015-05-13T11:50:17.224-04:002015-05-13T11:50:17.224-04:00Seems pretty clear to me that something Amber Aler...Seems pretty clear to me that something Amber Alertlike was going on straight from the motion signed by Attorney Campbell Barrett and Attorney Jon T. Kuckucka of Budlong & Barrett.and if you need further help located on page 4.Catharine Sloperhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08915766638552096174noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9173416929829483433.post-71567084834150401762015-05-13T11:47:44.706-04:002015-05-13T11:47:44.706-04:00"There was no Amber Alert", Item 12 of D..."There was no Amber Alert", Item 12 of Dec. 20, 2013 "Plaintiff's Emergency Motion to Suspend Defendant Mother's Access to Minor Child and to Award Temporary Sole Custody to Plaintiff Father" "The plaintiff father is in the process of speaking to the police about obtaining an Amber Alert."Catharine Sloperhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08915766638552096174noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9173416929829483433.post-8154460778645720232015-05-13T09:28:56.905-04:002015-05-13T09:28:56.905-04:00You are just continuing your fairy tale. There is ...You are just continuing your fairy tale. There is virtually nothing in your story that is true. You should be sued for libel and defamation putting out this garbage.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9173416929829483433.post-19039477136950116002015-05-13T07:28:10.134-04:002015-05-13T07:28:10.134-04:00You call yourself a journalist but yet you continu...You call yourself a journalist but yet you continue to publish false information. There was no Amber Alert! It wasn't the West Hartford Police who were involved on December 20, 2013. The court record of State Marshal Kaz states he did not see Colleen on December 20, 2013 around town several times. Colleen was to bring her child to Jefferson Labs immediately following the morning office visit with the doctor not later in the late afternoon. As I stated these are but a few facts that you continue to report that you have a difficult time getting straight. Just because you state it as fact your readers should know that you are wrong!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com