SO WHY DID JUDGE BARRY PINKUS PUT A PROTECTIVE ORDER BEYOND ADRIANNE OYOLA'S REACH IN VIOLATION OF OUR OWN CONNECTICUT LAW? THE BOTTOM LINE IS JUDGE PINKUS DID NOT OBEY THE CT GENERAL STATUTES AND USED A BURDEN OF PROOF THAT WAS WELL BEYOND WHAT THE LAW REQUIRED.
FOR MORE INFORMATION ON THIS POINT, SEE THE LINK BELOW:
http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/migrated/domviol/pdfs/Standards_of_Proof_by_State.authcheckdam.pdf
Yet another problem in Family Courts in CT is that they have too much discretion (power)! Restraining orders issue here at the judge's discretion. You can see from other states they use the language "shall" issue. Nothing discretionary about it. We need to start limiting the discretion afforded in our state to family court judges with changes to the laws made by our legislatures that the people need! Needs to start next session.
ReplyDelete