PAGES

▼
Showing posts with label CUSTODY EVALUATIONS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CUSTODY EVALUATIONS. Show all posts
Friday, September 13, 2024

WHAT DOES JUSTICE FOR JENNIFER ACTUALLY MEAN?

›
In a Court filing requesting a restraining order against her ex-husband, Fotis Dulos, Jennifer Farber-Dulos stated, "I am afraid of my ...
1 comment:
Tuesday, September 10, 2024

MICHELLE TROCONIS: WHY RISK A CONTEMPT OF COURT?

›
On February 15, 2024, on the 22nd day of her criminal trial, Michelle Troconis sat before her computer scrutinizing the Dulos Custody report...
Thursday, April 5, 2018

H.B. No. 5575 APPEARS TO HAVE PASSED THROUGH THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE UNANIMOUSLY!

›
Raised H.B. No. 5575  Session Year 2018 AN ACT CONCERNING THE APPOINTMENT OF A LICENSED HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL TO PROVIDE TREATMEN...
Tuesday, November 28, 2017

THE CT JUDICIAL BRANCH FAMILY CIVIL INTAKE FORM: IS IT A PATRIARCHAL TOOL OF OPPRESSION!

›
*Ms. Doreen Ludwig, author of "Motherless America" provided the original inspiration for this article as well as a considerable...
8 comments:
Wednesday, August 9, 2017

HAVE YOU BEEN HARMED AND DAMAGED BY CUSTODY EVALUATOR DR. JAMES CONNOLLY? WE WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU!

›
For many years now, there have been many complaints from protective mothers in regard to custody evaluator Dr. James Connolly.  Are you o...
15 comments:
Tuesday, May 9, 2017

CHANGES TO CT PRACTICE BOOK SEC. 25-60 RE FAMILY SERVICES EVALUATIONS PUT LITIGANTS AT RISK!

›
PAGE 42-43 SUGGESTED PRACTICE BOOK REVISION-THIS WOULD BE ADDED TO SECTION 25-60 ON FAMILY COURT PRACTICE AND POTENTIALLY RESTRICT LIT...
6 comments:
Tuesday, May 2, 2017

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU EMPOWER A BULLY: THE TRAGEDY OF MATHEW COULOUTE!

›
There are few cases that present the spectacle of the foolishness of family court here in CT quite as effectively as the Mathew Couloute ...
40 comments:
Saturday, March 4, 2017

ARE FORENSIC EVALUATIONS OR PSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATIONS LEGAL IN FAMILY COURT PROCEEDINGS? "WONDER WOMAN" OF THE GOLDEN LASSO BLOG SUGGESTS THAT THEY ARE NOT!

›
USC 42 § 12101 – 12203 and the NPRM and Judicial Conferences have provided functional regulations re: confidentiality, all of which imp...
1 comment:
Monday, August 15, 2016

DOES A CHILD'S PREFERENCES MATTER DURING A CUSTODY DISPUTE?

›
My parents were married for over 60 years, but it wasn't all a bed of roses.  I will never forget how, after one of their big fights, m...
Thursday, July 23, 2015

MORE COMMENTS ON THE DECISION OF THE FAMILY COMMISSION TO RETREAT BEHIND CLOSED DOORS!

›
Denying the parents access to the Custody Study is a common and old scam. Here's a paragraph from the minutes of the January 21, 2015 F...
1 comment:
Wednesday, July 22, 2015

MORE RESPONSES TO NEWS THAT FAMILY COMMISSION IS DISBANDING, RETREATING BEHIND CLOSED DOORS!

›
Here is my favorite Munro story:  The psychologists that were big into the "custody study" business realized that it if they...
3 comments:
Sunday, May 3, 2015

FURTHER TEST RESULTS: THE COLLEEN KERWICK STORY, PART IV

›
I've pretty much covered all the significant points that were in the Savino custody evaluation.  But there were a few additional areas ...
12 comments:
Friday, May 1, 2015

FINDING OUT THE TRUTH: THE COLLEEN SAVINO STORY, PART III

›
In looking at a custody case like the one Savino v. Savino , it can be really difficult to be sure who is telling the truth.  So many case...
12 comments: