PLEASE NOTE: This blog is a bigotry free zone open to all persons, regardless of age, race, religion, color, national origin, sex, political affiliations, marital status, physical or mental disability, age, or sexual orientation. Further, this blog is open to the broad variety of opinions out there and will not delete any comments based upon point of view. However, comments will be deleted if they are worded in an abusive manner and show disrespect for the intellectual process.
Tuesday, May 13, 2014
FOR THE REAL STORY IN ATTORNEY PAUL GREENAN'S FAMILY COURT CASE, SEE THE LINK BELOW:
The Appellate Court decision recently came out in this case ruling against Paul Greenan. One commentator stated in response the following:
"This case is the AC's first decision post signing of the new bill on Friday. And so the first "standard of conduct" for an AMC set by the judiciary is this: That a court-appointed AMC does not have to meet the children. And that it is "reasonable" for an AMC and GAL who collectively spent 4.5 hours with the children to bill a family $252k. And the worst of all: it is okay for a trial court to publish a memorandum of decision which contains a child's name, addresses and psychiatric history."