CT LAW TRIBUNE REPORTS: THE JUDICIAL BRANCH CUTS BACK ON LIBRARY HOURS!

Michelle Tuccitto Sullo of the CT Law Tribune reports as follows:

"Staffing shortages and the state's budget situation have prompted officials to reduce the hours of more of the state's law libraries.

Deirdre McPadden, director of judge support services, said the financial crisis, combined with the retirement of two law librarians, resulted in this decision.

The latest budget season hit the court system hard, with the state Judicial Branch having to deal with a $77 million reduction in the budget for the 2016-17 fiscal year..."

READ MORE:

http://www.ctlawtribune.com/home/id=1202768277756/More-State-Law-Libraries-Going-on-Reduced-Schedule?mcode=1202617073650&curindex=0

MORE DETAILS ON THE BUDGET CUTS FROM CT JUDICIAL BRANCH ADMINISTRATORS!

"Connecticut Judicial Branch
FY 2016-2017 Budget

Due to the many questions that have arisen with regard to the Judicial Branch’s 2016-2017 budget, the Judicial Branch has developed this webpage, which will be dedicated to providing information about the budget and its impact. This webpage will also include updates as they become available."  

FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, SEE THE LINK BELOW:

http://www.jud.ct.gov/budget/default.htm

CT JUDICIAL BRANCH PRESS RELEASE ON COURTHOUSE CLOSINGS!

"Chief Court Administrator Patrick L. Carroll III today announced the first round of courthouse closings that will occur as a result of a $77 million reduction in the Judicial Branch’s budget for FY 17. The courts that will be closed are: Juvenile Matters at Danbury, Juvenile Matters at Torrington, Juvenile Matters at Stamford and the Judicial District Courthouse in Willimantic. Please note that the Stamford Judicial District Courthouse located at 123 Hoyt St. in Stamford will remain open, and all other court business will continue to be heard..."

For more of the press release, please click on the link below:

http://www.jud.ct.gov/budget/court_closings_061416.pdf

THE HARTFORD COURANT REPORTS MORE LAYOFFS AT THE CT JUDICIAL BRANCH!

David Owen of The Hartford Courant reports as follows:

"HARTFORD — Judicial Branch officials said Monday that 113 more employees received layoff notices last week. That brings to 239 the total of Judicial Branch employees losing their jobs as a result of state budget woes.

The cuts announced Monday include 10 case flow coordinators, seven family relations counselors, 22 adult probation officers, 15 juvenile probation officers, 53 judicial marshals and five intake, assessment and referral specialists..."

READ MORE:

http://www.courant.com/news/connecticut/hc-judicial-layoffs-0517-20160516-story.html

AS CUTS IN THE CT JUDICIAL BRANCH PROCEED, HERE IS A COMMENT POSTED ON THE CT LAW TRIBUNE WEBSITE!

Judge Crater

Apr 13, 2016

Judicial Department-State of Connecticut-(insider information) The following positions could easily be eliminated, with a savings of approximately 21 million dollars. Many positions have been “created” for friends and family of upper management. The list here barely scratches the surface of the abuse, nepotism, and double dipping that goes on. There are many more positions that could be eliminated. For example, there is wife of a chief clerk who is paid as a research attorney, close to 150k a year. She shows Judges how to use their laptops, I kid you not. Isn‘t that why we have an IT dpt? Our department for years was run by one person, it now has a deputy director, 2 program managers, and 3 admin. assistants, there is no need for any of these positions. It‘s outrageous. (These figures are estimated on the low end, many make more than what is listed)-----------19 senior judges @ $50k per year (in addition to collecting their pension)= $950,000.0069 Judge Trial Referees @ $50k per year (already collecting pension) = $3,450,000.0043 deputy directors @$120,000.00 per year = $5,160,000.0057 deputy clerks @80,000 per year = $4,560,000.0070 program managers @ $100,000.00 per year = $7,000,000.00Total: $21,120,000.00These figures do not take into account monies spent for pension plans, medical, cars, ins. mileage, etc. A true detailed examination into this abuse would save our State at least 100 million dollars per year, but those in power refuse to truly do what is right, most likely because they themselves are raping the system. DEMAND ACTION!--Judge Crater

Read more: 

http://www.ctlawtribune.com/id=1202754887691/Conn-Chief-Justice-Says-Layoff-Notices-Will-Go-Out-Thursday#ixzz45kx7JUQd

LETS GET HONEST! THE CT JUDICIAL BRANCH COULD EASILY CUT $70 MILLION FROM ITS BUDGET IN NON JUDICIAL SERVICES!

In a recent report of the "CT Law Tribune" dated February 19, 2016, Michelle Tuccitto Sullo reported that Governor Malloy is recommending that the CT Judicial Branch cut its budget by $70 million.

In response, Chief Court Administrator Judge Patrick Carroll III made dire apocalyptic predictions regarding what would happen if this cut goes through, "If a budget reduction of this magnitude goes into effect, the court system as we know it will not exist after July 1, 2016."

Of course, those of us who have been harshly treated by this very system, those of us who have lost children and have been driven into bankruptcy as a result of family court corruption, are not going to feel too upset about that. In fact, we are looking forward to it. In fact, if the CT Judicial Branch would like, I can easily compile a list of those judges, family relations personnel and judicial marshals we think the CT Judicial Branch can easily do without. If they are itching to close up some courts because of the expense, and need a few suggestions, I think we could do away with some of the nonsense going on in Middletown.

In discussing budget cuts it is interesting that for the better part the CT Judicial Branch talked about cutting financial resources to the most vulnerable, not to the fat cat money producing departments like family relations. The Branch proposed cuts to juvenile detention centers, alternative to incarceration programs, the Office of Victim Services, and translators. Nothing was said about cuts to services to persons with disabilities because, as we know, the CT Judicial Branch can't be bothered to serve those with disabilities, preferring to deny such people access to Judicial Services instead.

Anyway, before legislators and citizens in the State of Connecticut start running scared in the face of the terrifying scenarios that Judge Patrick Carroll describes, I think it is important to consider exactly what we are talking about. Specifically, for those of you who may not have known, it is worth taking note that while most people think the budget for the CT Judicial Branch pays for courthouses, judges, prosecutors, etc., it may come as a surprise to discover that The CT Judicial Branch also pays for what they call "a full range of alternatives to incarceration and evidence-based services for adult and juvenile populations." The latter definition is so general, it could pretty much cover anything, and does.

What this means is that, in other words, the CT Judicial Branch has economic tentacles in a broad range of areas--churches, hospitals, community organizations, and other government agencies--which goes well beyond their mandate "to serve the interests of justice and the public by resolving matters brought before it in a fair, timely, efficient and open manner." A selected list of such places is as follows:

21st Century Media Newspaper, LLC  $11,116

Access Rehab Centers, LLC  $75.00

Advanced Trauma Solutions, INC.  $373,272

Apostolic Community Church of Jesus & Ministries  $9,988

All Souls Unitarian Universalist Congregation  $14,664

African Caribbean American Parents of Children With Disabilities,  $100,000

APT Foundation: Treatment, Research, &
 Recovery  $370,000 

Aspire Family Medicine & Wellness Center $25.00

Association of Religious Communities, INC  $144,985

Attorney General $20,000 - why?

Bridges - A Community Support System, Inc.  $2,174

Catholic Charities & Family Services  $70,703

Catholic Charities INC Archdioceses of Hartford  $1,035,507

Center For Children's Advocacy  $10,500

Central Connecticut State University  $722,933

Central Washington Comprehensive Mental Health  $2,500

Child & Family Agency Southeastern CT INC  $1,599

Child Advocates of Connecticut  $50,000

Child Guidance Center of Southern Connecticut  $220,727 

Child Health and Development Institute INC  $262,500

Children in Placement Conn INC  $199,999

Children's Law Center of CT  $109,836

Clifford W. Beers Guidance Clinic  $251,664

Communicare INC  $98,028

Community Health Resources INC  $687,558

Community Partners in Action INC  $12,976,031

Community Renewal Team INC  $567,650

Community Resources For Justice  $116,305

Compass Group/Chartwells  $931,857

Compass Youth Collaborative, INC  $56,833

Connecticut Children's Medical Center  $10,926

CT Coalition Against Domestic Violence  $3,159,621

CT Community Providers Association  $45,785

CT Counseling Centers INC  $771,347

Concentra Medical Center  $26563

CT Junior Republic Association  $11,800,351

CT Renaissance INC  $4,049,142

CT Sexual Assault Crisis Services  $1,743,950

CT Youth Services Association  $275,000

David Mandel & Associates, LLC  $18,408
Department of Administrative Services  $2,294,497

Department of Rehabilitation Services  $144,750

Department of Children and Families  $3,264,180

Department of Corrections  $1,762,508

Department of Labor  $80,000

Department of Mental Health and 
  Addiction Services  $9,426,716

Department of Public Safety  $5,170

Department of Social Services  $72,412

Department of Transportation  $408,562

Domestic Violence Crisis Center  $140,934

Families in Crisis, INC  $765,113

Families and Children's Aid, INC  $106,673

Family Centered Services of CT INC  $269,192

Family Centers INC  $2,375

Family Reentry INC  $876,608

Hearst CT Post  $9,881

Intercommunity INC  $205,659

Klingberg Comprehensive Program Services INC  $255,211

Life Strategies Network LLC  $303,701

Lifebridge Community Services INC $163,050

Midwestern CT Council of Alcoholism INC  $1,306,552

NAFI Connecticut, INC  $6,137,086

New Directions INC of N. Central CT  $183,772

Newtown Youth & Family Services INC  $1,091,249

Post Traumatic Stress Center, LLC  $23,010

Removed For Privacy  $171,752

St. Anthony of Padua Church  $59,000

St. Francis Hospital & Medical Center  $1,212,736

Republican American  $3,230

Rushford Center INC  $492,075

Southwest Community Health Center INC  $251,172

St. Mary's Hospital Corp.  $25,400

St. Vincent Medical Center Foundation  $119,260

The Child and Family Guidance Center  $20,430

The Connection INC  $4,008,576

The Consultation Center INC  $226,750

The CT Law Tribune  $31,082

The Governor's Prevention Partnership  $559,389

The Hartford Courant  $2,082

UConn Health Center  $1,138,457

Wheeler Clinic  $7,250,401

William W. Backus Hospital  $16,214

Yale New Haven Hospital  $342,849

YMCA of Metropolitan Hartford INC  $375,000

TOTAL:  $86,543,553

Again, as I have said, none of the items on this considerable list has anything to do with judges, attorneys, clerks, courthouse upkeep, marshals, etc. etc.  These expenditures are all for social services.  Pretty much, if we eliminated them, it looks as though the CT Judicial Branch could save well over $70 million.  Keep in mind that this is just a selected list, so there are more social services that could be cut, if these are insufficient and the State of Connecticut would like to go further.

I did find it interesting to see the CT Judicial Branch contributing financial support to so many other agencies in Connecticut government such as the Department of Children and Families, the Department of Labor, the Department of Corrections, the Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services, the Attorney General, etc. etc. Here we have the CT Judicial Branch giving the Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services over $9 million dollars, then giving  over $2 million to the Department of Administrative Services and over $3 million to DCF.  I can imagine this tossing money back and forth between departments can be a good way of hiding who is getting what money.  You don't just have the State directly give DCF money, you funnel it through the CT Judicial Branch, or through some other government agency.  I can imagine there is a lot of playing around that goes on with this kind of activity.  Further, there is no doubt that this ability of the Judicial Branch to contribute financially to other agencies provides it with a powerful way to extend its influence throughout other State Agencies and potentially dictate their policies. 

The section on "Removed For Privacy" in CT Judicial Branch budget is the most extensive one that I've seen. It goes on for pages and adds up to $171,752.  That's a lot of under the table money.  I checked with other Agencies to see if they had a similar situation and they did not. Apparently, as soon as it was clear that the information on the budget would be free for public review, the other Agencies simply stopped using that label. This wasn't true of the CT Judicial Branch. I'll bet if the CT Judicial Branch eliminated all the expenses in the removed for privacy category, that would be a considerable sum of money.

If there is one conclusion you can draw from simply looking at this review of how the CT Judicial Branch spends its money it is that a considerable chunk of the CT Judicial Branch budget is not applied to running its courthouses, paying its clerks, or its judges. Instead, Judicial Branch money is going to what it said which is alternatives to incarceration, evidence-based services for adult and juvenile populations, and goodness knows what else, since they have a broad lattitude to spend public's money. 

The question we have as taxpayers, however, is since when did the CT Judicial Branch become a social services agency? Is that even constitutionally sound? We are supposed to have three branches of government, and judicial is one, and it should remain judicial, in my view. If it is going to be a social services agency distributing money for mental health services far and yonder, then it is no longer what our founding fathers imagined when it spoke of a judiciary. 

I also thought the Judicial Branch's contribution of approximately $3,159,621 to the CT Coalition Against Domestic Violence was considerable. Perhaps this explains the Coalition's weak and inadequate response to the legal abuse of victims of domestic violence in the family courts throughout the State of CT. Most of the women I've spoken to about the services they have received from this Agency express themselves in terms that can only be summed up by the word "wimpy."

Fatherhood Initiative funding extends throughout the vast majority of social services agencies, literally being tacked onto anything vaguely mental health related. So anything on this list with the words "family" or "children" probably has some fatherhood initiative funding associated with it either directly or indirectly. Most particularly I would focus my attention on the considerable sums of money given to the Catholic Church and also other Christian Churches. A considerable amount of fatherhood funding has been faith based funding.

I would also like to point out the many expenditures on print media. In particular, the CT Judicial Branch does contribute approximately $31,000 to "The CT Law Tribune" which acts as the mouthpiece of the CT Judicial Branch and the CT Legal profession as a whole. Money means control in my book. And while I am sure that the CT Judicial Branch is legally required to advertise positions available for employment, and money gets spent on PSAs such as advertising against human trafficking and similar topics, which would be, on the surface, legitimate, I wonder if the CT Judicial Branch is also spending on print media as a means to impact editorial decision making in favor of Branch policies. 

In this regard, I would like to point out that while "The Hartford Courant" only earned approximately $2,082 in the last fiscal year from the CT Judicial Branch, as a rule it has generally received from approximately $18,000 to $27,000, and from State government as a whole, it has received considerably more.

The bottom line is that when The CT Judicial Branch weeps and wrings its hands about the prospect of cutting its budget and talks in dire tones about having to shut down courthouses and fire personnel, I wouldn't be that concerned. It can survive perfectly well by sticking to its mandate of providing legal services and leave social services, and influence peddling to others.

The truth of the matter is that what we have here is the CT Judicial Branch expanding its power by extending its economic power throughout the State of Connecticut by adding social services to its mandate.  Then, at the same time, the CT Judicial Branch has been expanding its legal power and authority by manipulating The Connecticut Practice Book in its favor, and ignoring CGS 51-14 which requires that it ask permission of the State Legislature and the people first prior to doing so.

CT LAW TRIBUNE REPORTS THAT GOV. MALLOY HAS ASKED THE CT JUDICIAL BRANCH TO CUT ITS MONOLITHIC BUDGET!

The CT Judicial Branch has been asked to cut its budget
by $3.1 million!

READ MORE:

http://www.ctlawtribune.com/id=1202737894568/Governor-Asks-Court-System-to-Cut-Millions-of-Dollars-From-Budget#ixzz3mYk8WW83