PLEASE NOTE: This blog is a bigotry free zone open to all persons, regardless of age, race, religion, color, national origin, sex, political affiliations, marital status, physical or mental disability, age, or sexual orientation. Further, this blog is open to the broad variety of opinions out there and will not delete any comments based upon point of view. However, comments will be deleted if they are worded in an abusive manner and show disrespect for the intellectual process.

Friday, December 2, 2011

THE LIMITS OF REVENGE

One thing I hear a lot from friends of mine going through bad divorces is, "I'll sue him for that!"  The person they want to sue can be anyone--their attorney, the sucky accountant, the GAL, yes, the GAL is a big one to sue even though I have the feeling that they've got almost complete judicial immunity, the teacher who bad mouthed them about the kids or maybe even the custody evaluator who did worse.

All of these folks are rotten to the core and ought to be sued in my opinion.  Of course, after a year or so in a bad divorce, you pretty much have grounds to sue at least half a dozen people.  It's amazing how many people there are out in the world ready and prepared to make your life miserable, all for money, power, and position.  So, it isn't surprising that sooner or later litigants in family court start talking about how they are going to sue. 

Unfortunately, a lot of them start talking about it long after the opportunity is gone.  

Why?

Because, ladies and gentlemen, there is something called "The Statute of Limitations."  Every state has one, including Connecticut.  This means that after a certain amount of time, unless a legal exception applies, you can no longer sue a person for an injury because the Statute of Limitations has run out. 

The following is a list of some of the common limitations on your right to sue in Connecticut:
Defamation - 2 years
Fraud - 3 years
Injury to personal property - 2 years from date injury was discovered
Libel - 2 years
Medical malpractice actions - 2 years from date of injury
Breach of Oral Contract - 3 years
Personal injury actions - 2 years from date of injury
Professional malpractice - 2 years from date of injury
Slander - 2 years
Breach of Written Contract - 6 years
Wrongful Death - 2 years from date of death

These are mostly civil actions.  I believe there is no Statute of Limitations in regard to criminal actions.  Furthermore, the Statutes of Limitations vary according to cause of action, and they also vary by state. 

The timeframes I have provided are strictly those of the State of Connecticut.  If you live in another state, you will find different Statutes of Limitation for that other state.  

So when does a Statute of Limitations start to run?   A Statute of Limitations is said to start running at the time a claim accrues.  Ordinarily, that is the time at which an injury is suffered.  After that things become more complicated. 

For example, there is the Discovery Rule.  The Discovery Rule states that sometimes it isn't possible to figure out that an injury has occurred until long after it has happened.  For example, you may not notice an error in a will until the person dies and the will is being executed. 

When the Discovery Rule is applied to a situation, you can extend the Statute of Limitations in regard to your case.  However, you really have to read up on your matter and consult with an attorney to see if your claim to extend the Statute of Limitations will hold up in court. 

Another way to extend the Statute of Limitations is by arguing the Statute has been tolled because the victim was a minor, or because the victim was mentally incompetent at the time the injury occurred.  Or, perhaps you were in a coma and unable to pursue your legal rights.  Unfortunately, at this point, Connecticut has no law which extends the Statute of Limitations for injured minors. 

Any of these Statutes of Limitation can be circumvented by a prior agreement of the Parties involved.  So make sure you look at any agreements you sign to make sure that you preserve your rights. 

One problem for victims of high conflict divorce is that they miss the Statutes of Limitations because the divorce is still underway.  That means they are too exhausted with the ongoing litigation to get around to filing a lawsuit. 

Plus, in the end, as I have said, there are so many people to sue, who you gonna start with, right! 

Still, if you think you have a good case and you really want to pursue it, don't mess up the opportunity by missing the Statute of Limitations.  Keep track of when you have to file and consult with a lawyer about how to safeguard your right to sue. 

Usually, the lawyers, mental health professionals, and accountants who have victimized you have already victimized multiple other people before they got to you.  So the work you do in following up and pursuing a wrongdoer will save other people from suffering the way you suffered and, bottom line, it is absolutely worth it.

3 comments:

  1. I cannot agree with you more. Sadly when a divorce doe occur, children are usually involved. Family court in the state of Connecticut. Is so mentally draining physically draining, and the damage that can be done is overwhelming. It changes you, when you watch your rights are openly violated. To know that a "family " court is not about families at all. It is the money, the children are rarely talked about and their rights are violated as well. It is a tit for tat game, of exactly what you said POWER, greed and money. If more people would educate themselves, then you are much more aware of what has been done wrong. Far to many people are facing this issue, and being involved in the family court system, it is very rare that you come out as the same person you came in as. In order for these people to change their ways they should be sued. Document, document, document. It is so sad thy we have to fear our government, and the person you once were in love with thy life as made. It is so sad to see the change to greed, hate, hurt and a ongoing relentless battle. Knowledge is power, educate yourself to protect yourself. Do not trust anyone, especially in a family court when you have been done wrong and justice was nothing but a joke, then yes sue. Gals are immune, and that is something I will never understand. For what they charge and what they do not do for the child, besides make a lot of money for nothing. The family court is like a casino, but the only ones winning are the attorneys, judges, and yes the Gals..... know your rights, no sue for the wrong that has been done.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm with you on every word you have said, corrupt ct, and the only point that I would add is that if you plan on suing, make sure you don't miss the deadline as specified in the statute of limitations.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sorry corruptCT. I know how you feel about corrupt GALs and the power they have over the court. I wish there was a way to have them investigated but I don't know who to contact and if you proceed and do not succeed they will retaliate fiercely. Good luck - and keep us posted on anything you discover.

    ReplyDelete