PLEASE NOTE: This blog is a bigotry free zone open to all persons, regardless of age, race, religion, color, national origin, sex, political affiliations, marital status, physical or mental disability, age, or sexual orientation. Further, this blog is open to the broad variety of opinions out there and will not delete any comments based upon point of view. However, comments will be deleted if they are worded in an abusive manner and show disrespect for the intellectual process.

Wednesday, January 30, 2013

JUDICIAL NOMINATIONS COMING UNDER REVIEW! COME TO THE HEARING AND HOLD THESE JUDGES ACCOUNTABLE!

JUDICIAL COMMITTEE
PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA
 
FEBRUARY 1, 2013
 
10:30 AM IN ROOM 2C OF THE LOB
 
 
I.  JUDICIAL NOMINATIONS FOR REVIEW
 
To be a State Referee:
 
The Honorable Walter R. Budney of Ivoryton
 
The Honorable james G. Kenefick, Jr. of Guildford
 
The Honorable Paul M. Vasington of Niantic
 
 
To be a judge of the Superior Court:
 
The Honorable Jon C. Blue of Hamden
 
The Honorable Cynthia K. Swienton of Chester
 
The Honorable Henry S. Cohn of West Hartford
 
 
To be an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court:
 
The Honorable Carmen Espinosa of Southington
 
 
II.  WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSIONER NOMINATIONS FOR REVIEW
 
Randy Lynn Cohen, Esq. of Westport
 
Daniel E. Dilzer, Esq. of Middletown
 
Christine L. Engel, Esq. of New Preston
 
Jodi Murry Gregg, Esq. of Stamford
 
Stephen Michael Morelli, Esq. of Berlin
 
David Wayne Schoolcraft, Esq. of Hebron
 
Michelle D. Truglia, Esq. of Stamford
 

Posted by at
Labels:

5 comments:

  1. AnonymousJanuary 31, 2013 at 3:58 PM

    Is this list of Judges different from the meeting on Jan 14th?
    The Superior Court judge that was previously on the list ( "term expires Jan 27 2013") whom I wrote a letter about is not on this list.

    Also, will we actually be able to be heard about this? Like your posts of womens statements from the Jan 14th meeting?
    Thanks so much for posting this under-publicized meeting!
    Also,Fyi I found there may be a live stream of this online somewhere like CT State channel...

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousJanuary 31, 2013 at 4:51 PM

    Interesting link:

    http://www.ct.gov/jrc/cwp/view.asp?a=3061&q=384564&jrcNav=|

    ReplyDelete
  3. Catharine SloperJanuary 31, 2013 at 7:27 PM

    It says public hearing, so we should be able to provide imput. I was surprised it didn't seem well publicized. Anyway, it should be the same format as the 14th, but different judges.

    ReplyDelete
  4. SheWhoCanWriteFebruary 1, 2013 at 12:33 AM

    That would be IN-put. Not "IM-put." Right?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Catharine SloperFebruary 1, 2013 at 2:39 AM

    Hi, Connecticut truth. I love to investigate words the same as you do. When I looked up the word "imput" it was defined as a variant of the word "input". If you are interested in more information about that, see the following link:
    http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/imput
    For another one of those fun word questions, what is the plural of "fish"?

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)