PLEASE NOTE: This blog is a bigotry free zone open to all persons, regardless of age, race, religion, color, national origin, sex, political affiliations, marital status, physical or mental disability, age, or sexual orientation. Further, this blog is open to the broad variety of opinions out there and will not delete any comments based upon point of view. However, comments will be deleted if they are worded in an abusive manner and show disrespect for the intellectual process.

Monday, March 25, 2013

HB 6387 OUR CUSTODY RIGHTS AT RISK--AGAIN!


LETTER FROM PRIVATE ATTORNEY  GENERAL, MR. MICHAEL NOWACKI SENT TO ALL MEDIA OUTLETS IN  REGARD TO THE AT RISK CUSTODY RIGHTS OF ALL CONNECTICT PARENTS!
 
Dear Editor:

I am writing to your readers on a matter of great urgency concerning a legislative bill which is going to the General Assembly for a vote in the next ten days.

HB6387 was endorsed by 39 of the 40 members of the Joint Committee on Judiciary on March 4, 2013.  HB6387 is known as a “raised bill”—meaning that there was no “legislator sponsorship”.

HB6387 is an omnibus bill—cleverly entitled A Bill for Court Operations.  Sounds innocent enough on the surface?

HB6387 directly emanated from a public administrative judiciary committee named the Family Commission --chaired by Honorable Lynda Munro.  The Family Commission is composed of seven other Superior Court family judges, six lawyers, who voted on November 14, 2012 to send this language to the Chief Administrative Judge Barbara Quinn, to submit to the legislature.

In short, the bill proposes that a Superior Court judge, upon the motion of any party, would have the “judicial discretion” at any time during the course of a divorce  or post-divorce (even after a parenting plan has been signed) to remove custody of a parent “ex-parte” without a hearing.

If passed by the General Assembly, parents, children, grandparents, uncles or aunts could be stripped of their rights to the love, care and companionship of family members, without any due process or equal protection.

“Non-enumerated” rights of the governed are protected by the Ninth Amendment of the Constitution—but only if you defend these generic rights to life, liberty and property.

Judges should not be writing laws of self-empowerment. 

The Connecticut legislative judiciary committee is filled with a super-majority of part legislators who engage in full-time legal practices before the same judges who they are empowering.

If you oppose the constitutionality of HB6387, send a letter to your State Senator and Representative to vigorously oppose this clear and present danger to the “liberty” interests of familial association.

For more information on the history of the family court corruption in Connecticut, please visit my website www.no-wackileaks.com or call write to me at mnowacki@aol.com.

 

Michael Nowacki                                             mnowacki@aol.com

319 Lost District Drive                                    (203) 273-4296 (cell)

New Canaan, CT  06840                                  (203) 966-6474 (home and fax)

 

1 comment: