For Protective Parents. Your source for news and information on the broken Family Court System in Connecticut. I am NOT an attorney. This blog does not constitute legal advice.
PLEASE NOTE: This blog is a bigotry free zone open to all persons, regardless of age, race, religion, color, national origin, sex, political affiliations, marital status, physical or mental disability, age, or sexual orientation. Further, this blog is open to the broad variety of opinions out there and will not delete any comments based upon point of view. However, comments will be deleted if they are worded in an abusive manner and show disrespect for the intellectual process.
Praying someone will bring some prepared "language" defining the shared/joint issue. SO frustrating. Throw in the notion that an in-chambers, off-record, Judge to GAL (NOT representing the pro se parents-on paper) conference is BS!
I hope someone does say that any off the record conferences with the judge and attorneys and GALs is completely improper. There is so much wrong with these conferences, the inclusion of hearsay, unsubstantiated evidence and subtle innuendo--it is absolutely wrong. Yes, the lack of prepared language is a particular drawback. I feel that the task force leaders completely derailed the purpose of the task force wrongly.
Praying someone will bring some prepared "language" defining the shared/joint issue. SO frustrating. Throw in the notion that an in-chambers, off-record, Judge to GAL (NOT representing the pro se parents-on paper) conference is BS!
ReplyDeleteI hope someone does say that any off the record conferences with the judge and attorneys and GALs is completely improper. There is so much wrong with these conferences, the inclusion of hearsay, unsubstantiated evidence and subtle innuendo--it is absolutely wrong. Yes, the lack of prepared language is a particular drawback. I feel that the task force leaders completely derailed the purpose of the task force wrongly.
ReplyDelete