PLEASE NOTE: This blog is a bigotry free zone open to all persons, regardless of age, race, religion, color, national origin, sex, political affiliations, marital status, physical or mental disability, age, or sexual orientation. Further, this blog is open to the broad variety of opinions out there and will not delete any comments based upon point of view. However, comments will be deleted if they are worded in an abusive manner and show disrespect for the intellectual process.

Thursday, February 27, 2014

LIST OF CT STATE REPRESENTATIVES WHO DECIDED TO VOTE FOR A CORRUPT, ABUSIVE JUDGE--JUDGE OLEAR!

ABERCROMBIE
ALBIS
ALTOBELLO
ARCONTI
ARESIMOWICZ
BARAM
BECKER, B.
DARGAN
DAVIS
DEMICCO
ESPOSITO
FLEXER
FOX, D.
FOX, G
GENGA
GENTILE
GROGINS
HADDAD
HENNESSY
JANOWSKI
JOHNSON
JUTILA
KINER
LUXENBERG
MARONEY
MEGNA
MORIN
MOUKAWSHER
MUSHINSKY
NAFIS
RILEY
RITTER, M.
ROSE
SEAR
SERRA
TONG
VERRENGIA
VICINO
WIDLITZ
WRIGHT, C.
WRIGHT, E.
LABRIOLA
LAVIELLE
MINER
ODEA
O'NEILL
PERILLO
REBIMBAS
SAWYER
SCRIBNER
SHABAN
SMITH
WALKO
WILLIAMS
WOOD
ZUPKUS
ADINOLFI
ACKERT
BELSITO
BUCK-TAYLOR
CAFERO
CANDELORA, V.
CAMILLO
CARPINO
CASE
FLOREN
D'AMELIO
FREY
KLARIDES
SHARKEY (SPKR)
Posted by at
Labels: , ,

5 comments:

  1. AnonymousFebruary 27, 2014 at 2:04 PM

    Why is this judge abusive in your mind? Because you say so??? Maybe it's because the judge stood up for what's right and because you don't agree you say the judge is abusive? Your blog is a great example of why social media can be so misleading,slanderous, and biased.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Catharine SloperFebruary 27, 2014 at 6:41 PM

      As a reader of this blog, it is your option to use the comment section to correct anything you believe could be misleading, slanderous and/or biased, so go for it.

      Delete
  2. AnonymousFebruary 28, 2014 at 9:55 PM

    Yes, these 5 percenters (warring divorce cases) can NOT stand that someone thinks they're oh IDK bad parents. They are the ones who slander their exes, slander judges, and whine about the $$ being spent-and are unable to see their own role in these high conflict cases. Tragedy for their children :-(

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Catharine SloperMarch 1, 2014 at 12:42 AM

      So what you are saying is that Protective Mother, Jennifer Norton who tried to prevent the CT Judicial Branch from giving sole custody of her five year old daughter to the father, Petit Killer Komarsarjevsky after he came out of jail was somehow a bad parent? Wow! So you think it was just fine that the CT Judicial Branch gave financial and legal assistance to an incarcerated criminal who was known to have molested other girls in his family, and you think it was fine to just hand over custody of a five year old girl to a man like that? For those of you who are appalled by this kind of attitude and would like to know more, please read the article about this case at the link that follows:
      http://www.commdiginews.com/life/connecticut-court-failure-the-deadly-rebranding-of-joshua-komisarjevsky-10607/

      Delete
  3. AnonymousJuly 18, 2017 at 10:52 PM

    Truth be told, O'Lear shouldn't be on the bench. She seems to have a hard time reading through evidence and seems to condone abuse.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)