**URGENT NOTICE**
For those of you who have suffered from having Judge Maureen Murphy violate your due process or human rights in Family Court, we are asking that you file grievances against this judge.
Other parents suffering from Judge Murphy's orders will be filing grievances this week.
No grievance against any family court judge in this state has ever been successful. As any honest lawyer or other person with experience with the family court judges will tell you, all grievances against family court judges will be dismissed. Thus, I fear you are wasting your time.
ReplyDeleteThe Judiciary Committee does take them into consideration and so you never know. I think it is important to put these abuses on the record so when the time comes people who are supposed to make sure judges are accountable cannot say "We did not know." Just saying...
DeleteI understand that there is always at least one divorce industry representative on the Judicial Grievance Committee. This year, I think Attorney Barbara Aaron is the divorce industry representative on the Judicial Grievance Committee. So she will kill your grievance, and then the judges will thank her in some way, e.g., by appointing her GAL or otherwise forcing some family to send her cash. That's how it works in Connecticut.
ReplyDeleteA paper trail is not a waste of time when they can create a person out of fiction.
ReplyDeleteI think complaints are central to the documentation of problems within family court. If people do not provide concrete examples and place them on the record, there is little that the people in charge of enforcing proper ethical and judicial behavior can do. Plus, these complaints validate other complaints and create a paper trail that can assist subsequent victims.
ReplyDeletehttp://ctmirror.org/2012/02/22/judicial-confirmation-hearing-goes-script/
ReplyDeleteThis article is from 2012, you will not be the first:
Sen. Paul R. Doyle, D-Wethersfield, told Murphy that the committee was in receipt of letters from two people questioning her actions in a custody case, Doe vs. Roe.
One was from Shaw, the other from Eli Newberger, a pediatrician hired by the mother. Both complained that Murphy was hostile to the mother, deferential to the father and ignored evidence of physical and sexual abuse.