As we consider the death of baby Aaden Moreno, we do need to keep in mind that Judge Barry Pinkus, who denied Adrianne a restraining order which would have protected her and saved her baby's life, was the very same judge who gave full custody of a 5 year old little girl to rapist and killer Joshua Komisarjevsky. For the details of this, please click on the link below:
"Connecticut Court Failure: The Deadly Rebranding of Joshua Komisarjevsky" by Anne Stevenson
http://www.commdiginews.com/life/connecticut-court-failure-the-deadly-rebranding-of-joshua-komisarjevsky-10607/
For a description of Joshua Komisarjevky's criminal actions, see the Wikipedia description below:
From WIkipedia:
"During this time, Hayes and Komisarjevsky escalated the aggravated nature of their crimes: Komisarjevsky raped the 11-year-old Michaela.[12][13] Komisarjevsky, who had photographed the sexual assault of the youth on his cell phone,[14] then provoked Hayes to rape Hawke-Petit. While Hayes was raping Hawke-Petit on the floor of her living room, Komisarjevsky entered the room announcing that William Petit had escaped. Hayes then strangled Hawke-Petit, doused her lifeless body and parts of the house including the daughters' rooms with gasoline. The daughters, while tied to their beds, had both been doused with gasoline; each had her head covered with a pillowcase.[15] A fire was then ignited, and Hayes and Komisarjevsky fled the scene. Hayley and Michaela both died from smoke inhalation.[16]"
This is the kind of individual Judge Barry Pinkus considered would be a better parent than the little girl's mother who had been primary caretaker up to that time. And we are surprised about what happened to Baby Aaden?
The death of Baby Aaden Moreno was inevitable in the light of current Connecticut Family Court policies to place the interests of fathers well over that of mothers, no matter how criminal the fathers are.
A poster campaign could be successful. It could read something like this:
ReplyDeleteNO FORCED CONTACT WITH OR SOLE RULE OF OUR CHILDREN TO KILLERS!
REFORM CT FAMILY COURTS NOW!
There could be a local designated pick up point to distribute.
In my experience, family courts do not favor father's over mothers. It's usually just about money. I don't see a money angle in the Pinkus stories. One might become visible, however, if we knew who the various parties' lawyers were, if they were represented. Or this could just be incompetence or bad luck.
ReplyDeleteYou haven't spent much time in family court in CT or you are not being forthright when speaking about domestic violence cases in the family courts.
ReplyDeleteRegardless, the money is there. It's always somewhere and they know how to access it. They can get it from the the federal programs.
Maybe the media missed the link because the Jennifer Norton v. Joshua Komisarjevsky case has been removed from the public judicial website! The docket number is FA-05-4005226. It's gone...non searchable for public view!
Judge Pinkus was my Judge and he was completely negligent with my child. He is a sociopath. He turned my child over to his felon father as well.
ReplyDelete