Last Wednesday, April 29, 2015, I joined Elizabeth Sinatro
at the Civil Courthouse in Hartford, CT as she faced the
Flaherty Legal Group--Attorney James T. Flaherty and
Attorney Sandi Girolamo--who were suing her in
collections for fees related to her late father's divorce.
A graduate of Yale Law School, Ms. Sinatro's Dad was
a well respected Mechanical Engineer and patent
attorney who worked in the area of intellectual
property.
Not only did he work in private practice for forty years
in Hartford, CT, he was also the President
of the West Hartford Town Planning and Zoning
Committee. As an avid golfer and a very friendly,
considerate individual, Elizabeth Sinatro's
father was extremely well liked and well respected
by his peers.
Ironically, both he and Attorney James T. Flaherty
knew each other quite well. Ordinarily, in
the legal profession you would extend a level
of professional courtesy to another legal
professional. However, in the case of Ms. Sinatro's
father, who was dying at the time, Attorney Flaherty
entirely disregarded this professional understanding
and victimized his client the same way he had
victimized so many others.
Ms. Sinatro, who was acting on behalf of her father,
is one of the dozens of former clients Attorney
James T. Flaherty has taken to Court to collect legal fees.
At this court hearing, Flaherty and his crew were hoping
to obtain a pre judgment remedy to put a lien on the
property from the estate to guarantee his fees. This
is the standard operating procedure for Attorney
James T. Flaherty which he has been carrying out
now for at least a decade.
Jim Flaherty and his legal group have a track record
unlike any other attorney or legal practice. How this
group has avoided being disbarred is a mystery,
perhaps, a mystery that only a thorough investigation
of the CT Judicial Branch could solve.
In this particular case, Attorney Flaherty has taken on an
entire family. Ms. Sinatro's brother Paul explained the
circumstances to me in a recent letter, which went as
follows:
"My late father’s health was declining and his wife filed for
divorce. Jim Flaherty and the Flaherty Legal Group (FLG)
represented my father and my sisters and I had Power of
Attorney and were closely involved with the case. Per FLG
this was a simple case; an uncontested divorce, with one
home, no businesses to divide and straight forward assets
(checking, savings, retirement, investments). FLG
estimated the cost for the case to be $5-10k.
However, in violation of standard procedures in these
kinds of divorce cases, FLG did not do any discovery
on the household assets; did not put any protective
orders in place to protect his client and as we learned
after the case was over, they even agreed with the
ex-wife when she refused to turn over financial
statements, something FLG was warned would
occur.
FLG's representation bordered on malpractice and,
when it comes to Attorney James T. Flaherty, in no
way did he live up to his oath to represent his client
to the best of his abilities.
In the end, our father was coerced into a settlement
that equated to 36% of the entire estate and FLG
billed him over $60,000 for the expedited divorce
that had one deposition and no hearing.
When I questioned the final bill, Jim Flaherty became
hostile and aggressive. When we refused to pay the
trumped up bill, he “fired” our father as a client (charging
$5,800 to file the paperwork with the court) and put a
charging lien on my father’s portion of the net proceeds of
the sale of his house (this was recently deemed illegal by
the CT Supreme Court) and has filed suit against my sister
as executrix of the estate.
Following our experience we have come to understand
what a monster FLG is and we have learned of
numerous clients' lives that have been harmed by
this man and his team. As you probably know, FLG
has sued over 69 clients. Through my rudimentary
research I cannot find a Marital Law practice that
has sued anywhere close to that number of
clients during the same period of time. Even large,
active firms with 25+ attorney’s don’t sue at this pace.
Currently, Jim Flaherty has 3 open cases, two are where
he is suing clients (we are one of them) and I am not
sure about the other. His legal team of Sandi Girolamo
and Pamela Magnano do not have any active clients.
This firm is not the business of law.
At the end of the hearing on Wednesday, Judge Peck
decided to grant a continuance in the case even though it
was clear that, based upon the evidence, the case should
simply have been dismissed. Even more troubling, from
what I have heard, is the fact that at the same time
Judge Peck gave Attorney James T. Flaherty fairly
detailed instructions on what legal steps he needed
to take in order to overcome the technical legal
problems in the case.
She indicated that she was troubled that Attorney
Flaherty might be hindered in obtaining an outcome
that would benefit him. To me, it seems unlikely that
Judge Peck or any other judges at the Civil Court are
unaware of Attorney Flaherty's blatant misuse of
the Civil Court as his own private collection agency,
and as a means to manhandle and blackmail his
former clients. That it has come to the point
where the judges are taking their preferential
treatment of Attorney Flaherty to the level of
providing him with legal advice, this is unconscionable.
Has it come to the point where justice is for sale in the
courtrooms in the State of Connecticut, and
influence triumphs over doing what is right?