PLEASE NOTE: This blog is a bigotry free zone open to all persons, regardless of age, race, religion, color, national origin, sex, political affiliations, marital status, physical or mental disability, age, or sexual orientation. Further, this blog is open to the broad variety of opinions out there and will not delete any comments based upon point of view. However, comments will be deleted if they are worded in an abusive manner and show disrespect for the intellectual process.

Saturday, May 3, 2014

DIVORCE IN CONNECTICUT CALLS FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION TO ADDRESS CORRUPTION IN THE CONNECTICUT FAMILY COURT SYSTEM!

In this past year, the State Legislature has heard stories from parents and grandparents in family court who have faced horrible abuse and corruption. 
 
I have frequently talked about my own experience of spending $200,000 in order to retain custody of my own children, even though up until filing for divorce I had always been primary caretaker of my children. 
 
Others have talked about Guardians Ad Litem who charged hundreds of thousands of dollars for their services and emptied out their ward's college funds in the process. 
 
I hear from people every day who talk about how expert witnesses, particularly mental health experts, have blatantly lied in their cases.  I hear of attorneys who have threatened parents and blackmailed them for money.  One litigant talked about how he was asked to provide a bribe in order to obtain custody of his children. 
 
Overall, it appears that Connecticut Family Court has descended into chaos as judges ignore the law and rule in ways that are arbitrary and capricious.  The result has been children in the custody of abusive parents, mothers and fathers who have been denied any access at all to their children based upon fabricated evidence, and children denied their most basic needs for emotional and physical security. 
 
Recently, the Connecticut State Legislature passed a Guardian Ad Litem reform Bill S.B. #494, the first in an anticipated series of legislative steps to reduce the wrongdoing which has been rampant throughout our state Family Court system. 
 
Once this Bill is implemented, its provisions will provide additional safeguards for litigants and their children who enter Family Court in the future.  But what should be done for those, like me, who have endured severe financial damage as the result of court abuse, as well as the many other parents who still do not have access to their children because of past wrongdoing.  Is it too late for us? 
 
Some advocates have said that it would be naïve to expect the State Legislature to take steps immediately to return our children to us, to return our stolen money and assets to us, and compensate us right away for the suffering that we have endured.  I don't think so. 
 
In my view, the State of Connecticut needs to establish a Truth and Reconciliation Commission to investigate the wrongdoing that has taken place in Connecticut Family Court and provide reparations to the victims for that wrongdoing.  Some of the reparations could be financial while others could simply consist of public exoneration and public apologies from the Connecticut Judicial Branch.
 
What is a Truth and Reconciliation Commission?  A Truth and Reconciliation Commission has four major tasks:  1.  The exposure of the truth through investigating and reporting on atrocities; 2. Victim rehabilitation and reparation; 3.  Amnesty or punishment of perpetrators; 4.  Education and reconciliation.  
 
A Truth and Reconciliation Commission is a Commission that does the job of investigating and reporting on wrongdoing by the government and its enforcement agencies.  It is a way to address crimes that have been left unpunished and to address human rights abuses which have taken place, I would say, for example, in Connecticut Family Court. 
 
Most important is that a Truth and Reconciliation Commission can prevent the historical revisionism that often takes place subsequent to a major atrocity, such as the problem with holocaust deniers.  An example of historical revisionism which we find among Family Court perpetrators are statements to the effect that folks who report on these abuses don't deserve to be taken seriously.

Through the operation of the Commission, victims of human rights abuses can provide their testimony which is then placed on the permanent record and perpetrators have the opportunity to provide testimony acknowledging their crimes. 
 
The Commission can then take steps either to punish or give amnesty to the criminals involved and formulate what would be appropriate reparations for the victims. 
 
These activities are expected to educate society about the harm and damage that took place so that it does not happen again, and to provide instructions on how society should better conduct itself in the future. As one journalist has put it, "The truth-seeking processes [of such Commissions] allow societies to examine and come to grips with past crimes and atrocities and prevent their future repetition." 
 
Further, the activities of these Commissions should ultimately lead to reconciliation--forgiveness for the perpetrators, validation and compensation for the victims so that the people involved can pick up the pieces of their lives and move forward, and truthful information so that Society can proceed to operate in a more enlightened and mutually supportive manner on behalf of all segments of Society. 
 
The most well known examples of such Commissions is the Truth and Reconciliation Commission that was assembled in Cape Town, South Africa in 1996 after the abolition of apartheid.  In this situation, witnesses who were identified as victims of gross human rights violations were invited to give statements about their experience and some were selected for public hearings.  Perpetrators of violence could also give testimony and request amnesty from both civil and criminal prosecution.
 
Closer to home, in 2013 Canada established a Truth and Reconciliation Commission to investigate the human rights abuses that took place in the Canadian Indian Residential School System starting in 1876.  Apparently, for over a century generations of aboriginal children were taken from their parents and raised in overcrowded, underfunded and often unhealthy residential schools across Canada.  They were often denied the right to speak their own languages and told their cultural beliefs were sinful. 
 
Some of these students did not see their parents for years and a considerable number of them simply died.  The result was the destruction of Indian culture, lives cut short by drugs, alcohol, and violence.  Although the majority of these schools were closed in the 1990s, the devastating impact these schools had on the native peoples of Canada still remains.  The bulk of the work of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in Canada remains to be done. 
 
In Argentina, a Truth and Reconciliation Commission also addressed human rights violations and the disappearance of 30,000 students and intellectuals who were targeted because of their left wing political leanings during what has been called their "dirty war" which took place from 1976 to 1983. 
 
Chile established a National Truth and Reconciliation Commission to investigate the deaths and disappearances that took place during the Pinochet Regime.  The report of this Commission came out in 1991 and was supplemented by the Valech Report in 2005 and 2006 which was produced by the National Commission on Political Imprisonment and Torture. 
 
In addition, there have been additional Commissions like this in places like the Czech republic, El Salvador, Fiji, Kenya, Morocco, and many, many more. 
 
The Connecticut Judicial Branch has no means to assist the many parents who testified this past year about the financial exploitation and the legal abuse they have endured in the last two decades. 
 
So what is going to happen to those parents who have lost children and have been barred from seeing their children in violation of their constitutional rights? 

What about parents who have overwhelming evidence that their children are being sexually and physically abused by the other parent, yet instead of those children being protected they have been placed in the custody of the abuser?
 
What about parents who have had attorneys empty out their savings accounts, retirement accounts, and had them foreclose on their homes? 
 
What about parents and children whose private medical records, most particularly psychiatric records, have ended up quoted at length in memoranda of decision published on the internet for everyone to see? 
 
What about parents who have seen the opposing attorney in their case file lie after lie in documents submitted to the court?
 
And  what about parents who have had to endure hours of testimony by witnesses who made false statements about those parents in Court?
 
What about parents who have had no recourse in the face of memoranda of decision which judges deliberately filled with fabrications in order to silence parents and prevent them from speaking out about how they've been harmed?

What about parents with disabilities who have repeatedly been denied reasonable modifications which they are entitled to under Title II of Federal ADA law and who have seen their character and reputations unfairly destroyed based upon bigoted attitudes towards people with disabilities? 

What about the many, many children in cases in Connecticut Family Court who have disabilities which are documented in detail but who are also denied their right to access to Family Court and end up being medically abused and neglected? 
 
It is clear that the legal system has failed.  It is completely broken to the point where the State of Connecticut needs an independent means to repair the damage.  We have parents and children who need to be reunited NOW, without delay.  We have families teetering on the verge of bankruptcy NOW who need immediate compensation and cannot wait. 
 
A Truth and Reconciliation Committee with a mandate to investigate these crimes and bring them to light and make reparations is the only way that this can be done.
 
Therefore, the Divorce in Connecticut blog, on behalf of the victims of Connecticut Family Court, requests that the Connecticut State Legislature take steps to establish such a Commission immediately.

Friday, May 2, 2014

CONNECTICUT AN UNPOPULAR STATE TO LIVE IN?

This just in from the Avon Patch:
 
"Sayonara, CT!

That's what nearly 50% of residents would say if they could, according to a new
Gallup Poll.

Connecticut residents were second only to Illinois in their apparent dissatisfaction with living in their state. Fifty percent of Illinois residents polled would leave if they could, while 49% of Nutmeggers responded the same.

According to Gallup, "These findings are from a 50-state Gallup poll, conducted June-December 2013, which includes at least 600 representative interviews with residents aged 18 and older in each state."

Wednesday, April 30, 2014

CT LAW TRIBUNE REPORTS FAT CAT JUDGES PENSION PLANS UNDER FIRE!

Reporting on this situation, the CT Law Tribune states as follows, "As it stands, any lawyer who is nominated for a state judgeship and serves on the bench for even the briefest period is eligible for a pension equal to two-thirds of his or her judicial salary. A Superior Court judge currently makes $154,559 annually, meaning a pension would pay about $103,000 a year, plus benefits.

What was once a simple fiscal fact is now a bone of contention among some state lawmakers who noted that two of the 16 lawyers recently nominated by Gov. Dannel Malloy for Superior Court posts are in their late 60s and will serve only a few years before retiring and collecting a pension that could net them a million dollars or more over the rest of their lives.

A leading Republican lawmaker said he plans to have the General Assembly address this matter before the legislative session ends Sen. John Kissel, R-Enfield, the ranking Senate Republican on the legislature's Judiciary Committee, said it's not fair to other state employees — not to mention judges who have served for decades — that a newly appointed 69-year-old judges could theoretically serve one day on the bench and qualify for a $100,000-plus pension once they hit the mandatory retirement age of 70. Other state employees do not receive a full pension unless they've worked for 10 years."


For more information on this issue, please click on the link below:
 

Tuesday, April 29, 2014

CT LAW TRIBUNE REPORTS ON $10 MILLION DOLLAR VERDICT IN DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CASE!

The CT Law Tribune reports as follows, "In a wrongful death lawsuit filed against the Town of Plainville and two of its police officers, a Connecticut jury has awarded $10 million to the family of a woman killed by her ex-boyfriend on Valentine's Day 2009.

The family alleged that even though there was a restraining order barring the ex-boyfriend from coming near the woman, he continued to harass the woman and police did nothing to enforce the order.

Tiana Notice was 25 years old in 2009 when she was stabbed to death outside her apartment. The family's lawyers said she was stabbed 20 times by James Carter II of Bloomfield. Carter is serving a 60-year prison sentence.

On the day of the killing, Notice claimed to have received a disturbing email from the ex-boyfriend. Carter also told Notice not to report the email to police."


For more information on this article, click on the link below:

http://www.ctlawtribune.com/id=1202653204696/%2410-Million-Verdict-Returned-In-Domestic-Violence-Wrongful-Death-Suit#ixzz30JJSMr3E

CT LAW TRIBUNE REPORT ON BILL #494!

The CT Law Tribune reports on the passage of Bill #494 as follows:  "After all the acrimony surrounding the debate over guardian ad litem reform, the final votes in the General Assembly were unanimous. And the results led some lawmakers and advocates to suggest that the legislation granting expanded rights to parents in divorce and custody proceedings may be only the first step in a larger overhaul of Connecticut's family courts.
 
On Friday, April 25, the Senate voted 35-0 and the House of Representatives voted 129-0 to send to Gov. Dannel Malloy a bill that gives parents a greater say as to who will represent their children in contententious custody cases. It also would give the parties to a family court case legal standing to seek the removal of guardians. Further, it would require the presiding judge to spell out in advance the scope of a guardian ad litem's work, deadlines for completion and fees."


For the complete article, please click on the link below: 


http://www.ctlawtribune.com/id=1202652965182/Guardian-Ad-Litem-Reform-Approved-By-Legislature#ixzz30J2qYVOS

Saturday, April 26, 2014

SENATE BILL # 494 HAS PASSED!

FOR MORE INFORMATION ON THE CONTENT OF THE FINAL BILL, PLEASE SEE THE LINK BELOW:

http://www.cga.ct.gov/2014/amd/S/2014SB-00494-R00SA-AMD.htm

I welcome your views on this new legislation.  Is this more of the same corruption, or are there new safeguards that we should feel excited about.  Please leave your comments below in the comment section!

Friday, April 25, 2014

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH SITS ON COMPLAINTS AGAINST ABUSIVE MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS!

This report in from Ms. Susan Skipp:
 
My complaints against Horowitz and Krieger with the Department of Public Health "DPH" have been open for well over A YEAR, and are well stocked with criminal activity. This was after I found out the DPH was giving me false information (on paper) that they needed both parents' release to investigate. Lengthy discussions with the Secretary of State's office as well as Corporate Counsel for DPH revealed this is untrue as the DPH has full subpoena power.
 
When I inquired recently about the progress of this case, I was told by Maribeth Mendes and Katherine Boulware that the investigation is still open because no one has volunteered to decide it: I believe that is largely due to my insistence that no AFCC affiliated person be involved in the investigation. They usually cover for each other. For example, Dr. Elizabeth Thayer, who was on the Task Force to Study Legal Disputes Involving the Care and Custody of Minor Children which has now resulted in bill #494 and was co chaired by to AFCC GALs.  See the article below:
 

All but three members of the task force were AFCC members. Thayer, who also derives a sizable income via court appointments, finds no wrong doing as does Zazlow in DPH complaints against AFCC members. They are the two of the most often called upon volunteers. 


These kinds of conflicts of interest in connection to the AFCC's association with the CT Judicial Branch has led to numerous ethical violations.  For example, in my case, Judge Lynda Munro did not disclose her shared business interest with two witnesses against me.  Dr. Sidney Horowitz was a fact witness who perjured himself five times during trial. Although, at the time, Munro was purported to be a board member for the Connecticut AFCC, along with Sidney Horowitz, in the national AFCC newsletters; Still, the AFCC was not a registered entity with the state.  This is entirely improper.  Furthermore,  the AFCC ran unlicensed and unregistered for three years in my case, and illegally for almost 30 years prior.  For more information on AFCC ethical violations, see the article below:
 
 
AFCC policies and procedures in regard to court programming were and are unregulated because the principals of the now registered entity show two court support services division employees as principals. The third is an often court appointed and of the ilk of Horowitz, Elizabeth Smith. The CSSD workers, one in charge of family relations, implement and evaluate programming in family relations.  What is more, the AFCC does the GAL training which is required of all GALs employed in the State of Connecticut.  So this illegal operation was and continues to operate within the CT Judicial Branch in violation of all ethical principles.


The judiciary has been aware of these conflicts of interest, as has been the state's attorney and Secretary of State for over a year. Still, nothing has been done to stop this outrage, and, as a result, nothing has happened to the mental health providers who bypass state bidding procedures and find ways to avoid signing contracts with standard anti-discriminatory language.  Not only that, nothing has been done to punish the profiteering AFCC trained GALs who take college funds, retirement funds, 401k's, insurance policies", all in the name of the children involved who are left penniless with parents who are facing foreclosure and the loss of their jobs because of constant interference from the CT Judicial Branch.  The power behind this ripoff are the CT Family Court judges who act as collection agencies with the excuse that this forced contract shakedown for assets is justified because the have ruled without any statutory basis that GAL fees are also child support.
 
The courts receive federal funding that facilitates children being placed with violent, abusive and/or sexually abusive fathers. It's difficult to ascertain exact numbers as the judicial branch does not have a statistician to obtain accurate numbers, but it seems that since 2006, when AFCC programming was put into the Family Court System, and HHS fatherhood.gov money started pouring into the Family Courts, which spread through the State into Martinez grants, women started losing their children at alarming rates and "high conflict"/ high revenue cases emerged for family law attorneys and the myriad of other professionals. This has led to large number of custody conflicts, where protective mothers are losing children at more than triple the rate than before.
 
For a good example of how the process works, see the link below:
 
 
Many are forced to another unregulated institution of supervised visitation centers, many AFCC run, extending the ability of AFCC related businesses to continue their profiteering activities. These too have no oversight and are not recognized by the Consumer Trade Commission. 


Family court is a broken system that is harming many. The liability for the ADA violations for these AFCC practices can bankrupt the State of Connecticut in sanctions alone should the CT DOJ choose to pursue the many thousands of cases throughout the State. The CT Judicial Branch entered an agreement in 2003 for it's non-compliance with ADA. If the judicial branch wants to live up to the lie on their website "we are Ada compliant" first thing that needs to go is the AFCC which is not compliant with the ADA, and next the discriminatory federal funding that allows these policies to be implemented must go. 


When abusers and victims are placed in the adversarial position of a divorce court, the abuser will usually win.  This came to light by the DOJ commissioned Saunders report and Connecticut's skimpy data also shows that trend.  Attorney Stephen Dembo, a notorious wrongdoer in connection to incentivizing high conflict divorces on behalf of abusers, is ironically on the Family Commission.  FYI, Attorney Steve Dembo and Dr. Sidney Horowitz and been partners together in an extraordinary 68 high conflict cases conducted in Family Court.  Munro and Krieger started RFTD. These are just tiny cogs in a the dirty wheel of justice that spins in favor of the new carpetbagger class that has inundated the CT Judicial Branch in the last few decades.
 
 
The state's judicial practices have not just destroyed me and my children, but tens of thousands of others, ensuring future generations of dysfunction with which to reap ongoing revenue. This is a phenomena I imagine many people reading this article are experiencing. 


The fact that these crimes are well known--Attorney General George Jepson and Attorney John Hughes of the DOJ have been fully informed, and yet do nothing is indicative of the graft, corruption and greed driven practices by many which are subtly and not so subtly tolerated or even furthered by some of the most powerful politicians and government functionaries in this State. I have mentioned twelve crimes in this email and it's being sent to the entities responsible for investigating these crimes.  It is time that fit mothers, protective mothers, finally saw some action and that those individuals who are responsible for holding criminals accountable do something about the crimes that I have described in so much detail here in this email.
 
Family law in Connecticut, and that in so many states, has become an embarrassment to honest and moral citizens. It doesn't seem that many within the system are reaching into their personal wells of honesty and morality to fix the situation and that too many generally ignore the unlawful and criminal injustices occurring in family court as well as the many civil rights violations that have been documented.
 
This is a holocaust of our families and children in the State of Connecticut.  Something needs to be done now.  Citizens of the State of Connecticut cannot afford to remain silent.
 
In the words of the great Holocaust protestor, Pastor Martin Niemoller,
 
When the Nazis came for the communists,
I remained silent;
I was not a communist.

When they locked up the social democrats,
I remained silent;
I was not a social democrat.

When they came for the trade unionists,
I did not speak out;
I was not a trade unionist.

When they came for the Jews,
I remained silent;
I wasn't a Jew.

When they came for me,
there was no one left to speak out.
 
Sincerely,


Ms. Susan Skipp,
Family Court Activist,
Mother of Lost Children