PLEASE NOTE: This blog is a bigotry free zone open to all persons, regardless of age, race, religion, color, national origin, sex, political affiliations, marital status, physical or mental disability, age, or sexual orientation. Further, this blog is open to the broad variety of opinions out there and will not delete any comments based upon point of view. However, comments will be deleted if they are worded in an abusive manner and show disrespect for the intellectual process.

Wednesday, November 7, 2012

SUPERVISED VISITATION PROVIDERS!

Below is a link to suggested supervised visitation providers around the country. 
 
I do not endorse any one of them, because I haven't received feedback yet in regard to them.  But what I do say is that this link was sent to me by a person I trust. 
 
So for those of you looking for supervised visitation providers, do consider choosing from this list and let me know what your experiences are.  See below for the link:
 
http://svnworldwide.org/providers_results.asp


***This feedback just in, Visitation Solutions in Brookfield, CT is affiliated with several father's rights attorneys and father's rights mental health practitioners.  You might want to avoid that group.

***This feedback just in, The Exchange in Stamford is associated with a corrupt mental health professional, Dr. Adamakas, who has been associated with a number of improper rulings in family court.  This place is not on the list above, but I wanted you all to be aware of other places as well.

IF ANYONE ELSE HAS FEEDBACK, CONTINUE TO LET ME KNOW AND I WILL UPDATE MY INFORMATION!  THANKS!

33 comments:

  1. Cartherine, thanks for posting this link. There are so many problems with the supervised visitation companies that are not a part of this organization.

    You probably recall that one of them, "Nick Sarno" had as many as six different aliases and used an alias in his work, and he maintains rather unusual business affiliations with Greg Sarno, who is well known for his push to prevent parents from being forced to provide for children that are disabled, and unwanted. This organization charged approximately $8000 a month for access to a child, and my last information was that they/he holds the passport of the mother now, in lieu of payment. They are not members of the SVN.

    The SVN held a conference in New York recently which included the investigative research of Drs. Stephanie Dallum, Chris O'Sullivan, and Evan Stark. Many professionals from the NYC domestic violence support system attended and shared their experiences.

    While it's egregious to have mothers and children apart when they have both been victimized, It is better to have someone well educated and concerned towards the global issues presented by family violence cases. It's better that it is affordable, and that providers can become available that allow for visitation in less restrictive environments.

    Like you, I would like to see businesses that have to support domestic violence issues be a long past need in our society. I would lie to see peace and protection as the standard.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes, my best assessment of this is that the visitation services on this link are not on the criminal level that Nick Sarno and his cohorts are on. No parent should be bankrupted simply in the process of trying to maintain their ties with their children. Thanks for your insight.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nick Sarno owes me money still from last year and Dennis Puebla gave me a bad report, yet i have him on video not even around my child and I and said I need more visitation just so he can get more money. This man will feel pain like he has caused our family.

      Delete
    2. Dennis Puebla is a hazard. He lies only follows the GALs requests and charges $90 an hour for visitation.

      Delete
    3. Dennis Puebla is corrupt and abuses both the parent and the child that is being supervised. I was warned about him by one of his staff while being supervised. He charged me $75 for any change in the already schedule visit even if the other parent made the change which he did often so I'd have to pay an additional $75 for the change. Not fair not ethical not compassionate. I found him to be a bully and greedy. Lies in court and is recommended by the hired guns. Because I lived 40 mins from my child and my child requested to come "home" for visits, before our visit started I'd often already paid $100 just to pick my daughter up, plus the $75 for time change by ex.

      Delete
    4. Dennis Puebla was recommended by Attorney Louise Truax (who ran a supervised visitation center from her office) & approved by Judge Holly Avery-Wetstone. When will there be a class action against these corrupt criminals? Please start a class action!

      Delete
    5. I am in. Dennis Puebla had my child taken from me!!

      Delete
    6. Truax is the worst attorney ever. She couldn’t argue her way out of her dyke girlfriend Attorney Surette’s ass. Dennis Puebla is still running from me. He is so dumb. Get someone to supervise him while he is supervising you and your child and watch him cry behind bars. Where can I find him by the way?

      Delete
  3. I would not recommend any readers placing their telephone number on this website since it leaves you open to having random people give you phone calls! There are a broad range of individuals who review this website, some supportive and others not supportive of its purpose. I can be reached at my email address: Slopercathy@gmail.com.

    ReplyDelete
  4. FYI, for anyone who wants to know, I myself, were I required to do so, would never participate in supervised visitation since I believe that it is simply an opportunity for enemies to obtain more documentation against me. However, not everyone is in my situation, so I did want to make the list of providers available for anyone who might want to know. I obtained the list from a person who participated in the CT GAL training.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lisa Kouzoujian is the worst. She chooses single moms every time. I hate her. Stole my child!!

      Delete
  5. Hi:

    I just wanted to let you know that my guardian ad nothing (GAL), Jill Plancher, recommended I have supervised visitation with my kids, because I threw my back out while she was observing me with my children. I was taken by ambulance to the hospital in front of my kids.

    What a crime!!

    Anyway, I would like you to know that the supervisor she suggested was Nick Sarno, the above listed criminal. When I said no, she recommended Dennis Puebla. I think Dennis, being affiliated with her, is probably also scum and based on this link to her, should probably be avoided.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dennis is trying to have my daughter taken away with Lisa Kourzojian as Our GAL. She is the most biased individual I have ever met. It is a club in Stamford of “chose one parent”. This time they choose a provine drug addicted alcoholic mother who lies and lies and lies.

      Delete
  6. I am also hearing very negative information about Jill Plancher so others considering her should be warned. I have also heard terrible stories about Nick Sarno and also Dennis Puebla is a familiar name. So readers, be warned!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you get court ordered Lisa Kourzojian, say goodbye to your child. Unless you have money. She choose both Nick Sarno and Dennis Puebla to Supervise me. And DCF investigated the mother!! Go figure life. Worse. My daughter loves me most. That’s why the mother is pissed. The mother chose not to be a parent so I bonded with the child. Then Lisa believed the mother and the rest is history.

      Delete
  7. I have been forced into this nonsense of supervised visitation and was with a crappy provider. I proposed to the court to change providers based on my income. I submitted the new agency's CV via the GAL and got them approved. There name is Happy Family Services located in New Haven. They are good, non intrusive and reasonably priced.

    ReplyDelete
  8. simply STAY AWAY from Dennis Puebla

    ReplyDelete
  9. Dennis Puebla is NOT to be trusted. Be aware of Dennis Puebla!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have heard this frequently before! So thanks for mentioning this.

      Delete
    2. Dennis is all about lies. I should post his review of me. How do you report these guys?

      Delete
  10. Wow, thank you for sharing this about Dennis Puebla. Unfortunately we hired him and he was a disaster. Paid him in advance as requested for no show and he kept the money. One word to Dennis, Karma...

    ReplyDelete
  11. Dennis Puebla should be barred from the state of CT to practice as a supervisor!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. From what I have heard, I would absolutely agree.

      Delete
    2. Is there any kind of investigation into Dennis Puebla? I've heard nothing but bad things about him. In every case I've seen unless the person being supervised was drunk or on drugs during supervision, he always sides with the father and testifies to how great the abusive father was during supervision. He is clearly doing a huge disservice to protective mothers and it's a racket. Also he has an unofficial "sliding scale" so I've heard from wealthy people he's charging $175/hr to and people in Norwalk who are paying $125. His bills add up. A mom I met recently said that 2 supervised days a week cost her over $8K a month.

      Delete
  12. I totally agree about Dennis Puebla - terrible situation with him. Greedy.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I totally agree about him. Many issues I've heard over the past year. 1. He always sides with the father in court and will testify to what a great father he is. Never seen him speak against a father unless he was on drugs or drunk during visitation. So what's the value of his testimony? 2. He charges a sliding scale depending on where you live (a mom in Westport paid $175 hr and a mom in Norwalk paid $125). 3. He has a racket going. A mom I met recently was paying over $1K per supervised visit and didn't get a copy of the bills which were, of course, only seen by the abusive father. That's just madness.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Wow that's so in line with what I've heard. It seems to be that there's no oversight over supervisors. They can charge what they want. But what bothers me most is that they're undermining the person who is protecting the child. The supervision gets ordered (obviously due to some abuse or substance abuse), then the supervised parent "behaves" because usually these people know how to cover up their act. And then they end up in a stronger position because the supervisor is totally on the side of the abuser. Again, and again, and again. So the families get nothing (aside from a very big monthly bill).

    ReplyDelete
  15. Are there any good supervisors out there? I’m looking for a supervisor to replace one. I am aware of the Puebla reputation for being anti mother. And now I’m aware of Sarno too. This is just ridiculous, aren’t there any vaguely affordable and ethical/unbiased choices?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He is anti father too. It’s because he was banging me Ex

      Delete
  16. Dennis may just care about which GAL is recommending him so the money keeps flowing. He can be very wrongful in his thoughts and reports depending focus on whom the GAL wants to win custody. All with in "who is going to fill my pockets, as I ruin child's lives and family members who want to be a parent and be involved. Sarno is a joke!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Seriously. The GAL is choosing the mother and is forcing me out of my daughter’s life. I hate Lisa Kourzojian so much. Then Dennis came in my house and scanned my place and alerted the mother. I’m going to get him and show him what sadness is.

      Delete