PLEASE NOTE: This blog is a bigotry free zone open to all persons, regardless of age, race, religion, color, national origin, sex, political affiliations, marital status, physical or mental disability, age, or sexual orientation. Further, this blog is open to the broad variety of opinions out there and will not delete any comments based upon point of view. However, comments will be deleted if they are worded in an abusive manner and show disrespect for the intellectual process.

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

BACKED TO THE WALL, THE CT JUDICIAL COUNCIL FINALLY TAKES ACTION WITH JUDGE COFIELD

The article in "The Day" begins as follows:
 
"In 24 years, the Connecticut Judicial Review Council has held only 12 disciplinary hearings against sitting judges and two of them were prompted by the misconduct of Superior Court Judge E. Curtissa Cofield."
 
12 in 24 years, how pathetic!
 
Many of us have wondered what it would take for the Connecticut Judicial Council to take any action against a judge.  I'm a bit late reporting on this, but last June 2013, the Council actually did take action against Judge Cofield when she failed to provide rulings in ten child welfare cases.  For more information, click on the following link:
 
 
 
Basically, it took the combined fire power of the Commissioner of the Department Children and Families, Josette Katz as well as the Attorney General, George Jepson.  So you miserable, powerless pro se people don't start getting any fancy ideas that you can exercise such leverage and get the same kinds of results with your complaints!

No comments:

Post a Comment