PLEASE NOTE: This blog is a bigotry free zone open to all persons, regardless of age, race, religion, color, national origin, sex, political affiliations, marital status, physical or mental disability, age, or sexual orientation. Further, this blog is open to the broad variety of opinions out there and will not delete any comments based upon point of view. However, comments will be deleted if they are worded in an abusive manner and show disrespect for the intellectual process.

Friday, May 9, 2014

NEW PROPOSAL FOR CONNECTICUT FAMILY COURT REFORM!

By Jane Addams

I am writing to you to share with you my ideas about how to improve the Connecticut Family court system and to make the divorce/custody experience a healthier one for everyone involved, and also make it more effective and efficient overall.  I would appreciate any feedback on my ideas or assistance in growing these ideas into a bill. 

1.  We need effective Parenting Education Classes, and we need to encourage parents to attend them.

The current Parenting Education Classes that are required for divorce should be improved and extended.  The classes need more in-depth explanations of the impact that parental conflict has on children and the parents.  I also feel that all parents who are engaged in a contested divorce with children or who are involved in the custody process need to be required to engage in co-parenting therapy.  Such co-parenting therapy should extend into the whole time the parties are engaged in the court proceedings. 

I also feel that the loop holes that allow a parent to opt out of the requirement to take a Parenting Education Class needs to be tightened and monitored closely.  The court should make it a priority to ensure every parent is reminded/educated on the potential impact their legal proceedings can have on them and their children.  This will help motivate and those encourage parents who are able to develop insight through the Classes about the effect of their behavior on their children to do better.  For those who need assistance, it will keep these parents focused on doing what is best for their children and themselves which will minimize the negative impact that conflictual parental court proceeding have on children and parents. 

In the end, good attendance at the Parenting Education Classes will make both children and parents healthier.  This will help the court system operate more effectively and efficiently, saving time and money, because it will be less bogged down by motions and cases where parents are not focusing on what is best for their children and themselves.  

It will help prevent, what is unfortunately too common, situations where parents are tying up the  court by using it for revenge.  I base this recommendation on the simple premise that the natural "normal" and healthy human state allows for cooperation and compromise, particularly in regards to making decisions about children. 

Along the same lines, anytime parents can not communicate and develop an agreement, this is an indication that there are underlying "problems" that need to addressed.  And as long as these root issues are not addressed than the conflict will continue, despite any well meaning court order or GAL intervention, etc.




2.  Children should receive counseling if their parents are engaged in high conflict divorce proceedings. 

Children also be required to receive therapeutic support the whole time their parents are engaged in contested court proceedings.  Whenever there is conflict between parents, a child will be caught in the middle and this will absolutely cause painful feelings that need to be addressed immediately or these feelings will have a residual effect on the child. 

Psychological research has shown that the quicker the support a person with emotional/mental issues receives, the more effective the help.  The therapist who is assigned to support the children is not only a person who helps the children process and manage their feelings, this person can also be an advocate for the child, once again, helping everyone involved keep the child's best interest as a priority. 

I base this suggestion on the simple premise that when a child is experiencing additional negativity in her life, then she needs additional positive support to heal from it and prevent it from becoming a residual issue.




3.  Family Relations Counselors should be required to attend CEU training.

I recommend that anyone involved, working for, or contracted by the Family Court system be required to attend CEU training, particularly in regard to sensitivity/psychology/child development/human service classes, with built-in incentive programs that reward healthy and timely handling of cases to help them also stay focused and motivated to keep children's and parent's best interest as top priority. 

I also recommend some sort of moral boosting stress reduction initiative be implemented in the Family Court system  This will help combat the apathy and corruption that is an epidemic in the Family court system.  It is hard for Family Court workers to do their jobs properly if they are stressed out and disconnected from the consequences of their actions.  

And once again, whatever training they receive during the education is not effective to prevent apathy and corruption from seeping into the system.  They need constant reminders as we all do.  I base this suggestion on the fact that the only way to truly improve interactions between people is to ensure that both parties are getting their needs fulfilled.  Parents need help and support to focus on what is best and so do the workers.  I think this idea will help make the Family Court reforms more palatable to all involved. 

I welcome additional thoughts and responses to this proposal.  Please leave your ideas in the comments section below. 

SHEILA HARRINGTON ON THE JUSTINA PELLETIER AMENDMENT!

REP. JIM LYONS SPEAKS ON BEHALF OF JUSTINA PELLETIER!

Tuesday, May 6, 2014

LIBERTY COUNSEL AND LOU PELLETIER RESPOND TO MASS. DCF REUNIFICATION PLAN!





Massachusetts Department of Health and Human Services Secretary John Polanowicz released a plan to reunify Justina with her family, but it has significant issues that must be addressed. Liberty Counsel believes that it would be ideal to get Justina to Connecticut, if these concerns are handled.


Pelletier Response to Polanowicz Plan


The Pelletier family is extremely disheartened to learn that the draft May 5, 2014, Polanowicz Plan for returning Justina was released to media prior to the Pelletiers' meeting with Secretary Polanowicz. The Pelletiers had hoped to continue negotiations in good faith in private, as had been indicated previously by DHS.

Liberty Counsel has reviewed the plan that was announced to the Pelletiers today by Secretary Polanowicz. While it is a good "baby step" in the right direction, Liberty Counsel and the Pelletier family still have several very significant concerns.

First, the statement in the Plan that "only the Juvenile Court has the authority to determine when and if custody should be returned" is inaccurate. DCF’s own regulations for case closure make it abundantly clear that it is within DCF's power to end this situation immediately. If DCF walked into court tomorrow morning, and informed the judge that they were no longer objecting to a return of Justina to her loving parents in Connecticut, this case would be closed within hours. Moreover, the DCF regulations explicitly state that DCF "does have the option to close cases by administrative decision without court action" even if their custody is based on a court order. The notion that this is all out of DCF's hands is demonstrably wrong.



Medical treatment: The Polanowicz Plan requirement that the Pelletiers "Follow through with the Tufts Medical Center Plan" is perhaps the most concerning, because the Pelletiers have no control over Justina's medical care; they have no say in it whatsoever. Moreover, they have consistently been denied any information about Justina's medical condition by DCF. All information about Justina's condition has come through Justina or some other source. It has never come directly through Justina's doctors, because DCF has forbidden them from speaking with the Pelletiers. DCF has even ignored Judge Johnston's order of Tufts medical supervision and direction.



Therefore, the Pelletiers must be assured of the following: 1) DCF itself will follow Tufts Medical Center guidance in all aspects, giving Tufts complete control over Justina's care in all areas, including scheduling of appointments, medical procedures, and other issues identified by Tufts Medical Center. 2) The Pelletiers be given accurate information and open lines of communication with Tufts Medical Center health providers, to determine what Tufts Medical Center (and Dr. Mark Korson) believes to be necessary for Justina's medical future.

Another medical treatment concern is that the Polanowicz Plan proposes that Justina be housed at the behavioral issues wing of the JRI Susan Wayne Center for Excellence, instead of a rehab therapy center such as Gaylord Rehabilitation Center, or the Hospital for Special Care, both of which are staffed with medical professionals and are also convenient for family visitation. Justina does not need more "behavioral modification" - she needs medical treatment and physical therapy, to say nothing of her educational and social needs.



Educational needs: In regard to Justina's education, Glenn McGrath, Director of Pupil Services for the West Hartford Public Schools, would like for Justina to be able to receive continued education assessments, and ideally, return to class immediately. While the family would like Justina returned directly to their custody, a suitable private foster care provider within the greater West Hartford area would enable Justina's educational and social needs provided by the West Hartford Public Schools to resume immediately. While the Susan Wayne Center for Excellence may be a good institution appropriate to Justina's needs in other aspects, its location is too far away from the West Hartford Public Schools to address Justina's educational and school socialization needs.

Visitation with Family: The Polanowicz Plan has not addressed Justina's social needs in regard to family visitation, either at the Susan Wayne Center, or with a foster family or care center within the West Hartford area as described above. Justina has been constantly subjected to less-favorable visitation rights than other children who have surrounded her. Justina must be allowed much more frequent visitation. Ideally, visitation with her parents should occur whenever she desires, and whenever the family's schedule permits. Emotional support by her family, after 15 months' separation, is critical to her emotional well-being.

No timeline for goals: A final significant concern relates to the Plan's open-ended nature - given that nearly 15 months have passed since Justina was removed from her parents' custody, DCF's history in this case elicits serious concerns about the lack of specific deadlines.



If these concerns are adequately addressed, the Pelletiers believe that significant progress can be made toward the resolution of Justina's medical needs, and the return of Justina to her loving family.

MASS. DCF CALLS FOR JUSTINA PELLETIER TO RECEIVE THE EXACT SAME MEDICAL TREATMENT SHE WAS RECEIVING BEFORE BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL SNATCHED HER!

LIFE NEWS.COM reports the following:

“Ironically, DCF says that it will support reunification if the Pelletiers follow Tufts Medical Center care plan, which is what the Pelletiers wanted to do 14-months ago when Boston Children’s Hospital created a new plan and brought in DCF to enforce it,” said Mat Staver, Founder and Chairman of Liberty Counsel.

No wonder Mr. and Mrs. Pelletier are irate!  And what is worse is the subtle but totally false implication that the Pelletiers weren't doing just that!

Mat Staver attributes this nonsense to a bunch of incompetent bureaucrats who are seeking to cover their tracks and who should be investigated and held accountable.  I certainly agree.

MARCH 25, 2014 JUSTINA PELLETIER RULING!

Below is a copy of the March 25, 2014 ruling in Justina Pelletier's case.  What I find interesting is that CT DCF didn't want to take the case and kept on putting it back in Massachusetts.  I guess CT DCF didn't want to rush in where Angels fear to tread and for once showed some common sense.

I think it is striking how Judge Johnston quoted all these professionals who make negative comments about Mr. and Mrs. Pelletier.  What happened to the Pelletiers is what happens to so many of us, that is, we are abused and attacked and then when we seek to defend ourselves or to position ourselves so our circumstances improve, the Judges, Attorneys, GALs, mental health professionals, and others characterize us as out of control, angry, and unreasonable, etc. 

It is interesting how so many parents who are denied their fundamental human and civil rights, most particularly their rights to due process and to parent their children, when they start to protest this treatment find themselves generally vilified.  I think that is the most deeply hurtful aspect of being subject to these kinds of human rights abuses--the lies that get told about you, and the false characterizations. 


Suddenly, the fact that you have been a good citizen and a good friend to others, the fact that you have given of your strengths and abilities and shown compassion to your neighbors--none of that matters to Family Court or DCF because they are determined to destroy any shred of good reputation you might have in their desperation to justify their wrong doing, using any smear tactics they have available.  Sadly, this is what is happening in the Pelletier case.


Anyway, not to keep carrying on.  If you are interested in the decision, please click on the link below:







http://www.scribd.com/doc/214568993/Justina-Pelletier-ruling