THE CT JUDICIAL BRANCH TAKES REVENGE AND THE CT LAW TRIBUNE SILENCES ITS CRITICS! THE TED TAUPIER DEBACLE CONTINUES!

I'm not the kind of blogger who goes for casual updates as many of you can attest.  However, I did find it hard to keep quiet about some of the more recent developments in the Ted Taupier case.  

It seems as though after sentencing Ted Taupier to a crushing 18 months in jail simply for speaking his mind privately among a small group of likeminded friends, the CT Judicial Branch is unable to control itself and is going for the jugular in seeking further revenge.  As you know, I had posted a link to a Go Fund Me page for Ted Taupier in order to defray the expenses related to his legal defense and also to help him pay for his mortgage so he has a roof over his head.  For those of you interested in that story, please see the link below:  

http://divorceinconnecticut.blogspot.com/2016/01/go-fund-me-account-now-open-fundraiser.html

However, from what I've heard the CT Judicial Branch contacted the "Go Fund Me" website and has had Ted's Go Fund Me account shut down.  Go figure!  Among those of us who have spent the last few decades observing and experiencing the bullying and racketeering directed towards family court victims, even we didn't expect this level of outrageous behavior! Does anyone know if this is even legal?  Oh, but now, now, when has the CT Judicial Branch ever had respect for the law!  In my dreams, perhaps! 

Next, I had recently reported on Attorney Norm Pattis' even handed and reasonable commentary on the Ted Taupier case.  See the link below:

http://divorceinconnecticut.blogspot.com/2016/01/norm-pattis-addresses-reality-of-how.html

Like many who read Attorney Norm Pattis' Op-Ed in the on-line CT Law Tribune website, I left my commentary at the bottom of his remarks.  From my understanding the comment section was eventually filled with as much as 40+ comments and yet I was recently informed that all of these comments have been deleted.  It looks to me as though by deleting public comments the CT Law Tribune has also destroyed any claim it may have had to journalistic neutrality.  The claws have been removed from the velvet glove and now we know who runs the Tribune--yes, it's the CT Judicial Branch.  

Seriously, I imagine the CT Judicial Branch oozing with corrupt legal functionaries covered with the blood of its victims, arrogant and gleeful, grinning widely exposing its fangs, reaching its chubby hands out for more.  Somebody draw that, because it would be the most truthful portrayal of the CT Judicial Branch ever!

MICHAEL VOLPE ON TESTING THE LIMITS OF FREE SPEECH IN THE TED TAUPIER CASE!

MICHAEL VOLPE REPORTS IN "COMMUNITIES DIGITAL NEWS" AS FOLLOWS:

WASHINGTON, January 20, 2016 – An “ugly” but private email will test the limits of free speech and possibly set precedent, according to a noted attorney handling the case.

Edward “Ted” Taupier, 50, was convicted of threatening a judge and breach of peace and sentenced to 18 months in prison by Connecticut Judge David Gold in a bench trial. 

The conviction stems from an August 2014 email Taupier sent that described details of the home of his then divorce judge, Judge Elizabeth Bozzuto, “Bozzuto lives in watertown (sic) with her boys and nanny…there is 245 y(a)rds between her master bedroom and cemetery that provides cover and concealment,” and ended with an homage to Charlton Heston, “They can steal my kids from my cold dead bleeding cordite filled fists…as my 60 round mag falls to the floor and I’m dying as I change out of my 30 round mag.”

It was established in the first day of the original trial that Taupier never sent the email directly to Bozzuto. Instead, he sent it to six individuals.

Evidence also showed the statement about Judge Bozzuto was part of a thread in which the individuals complained of their own divorce and custody trials..."

Read more at:

http://www.commdiginews.com/politics-2/law/ugly-email-case-to-clarify-true-threat-test-free-speech-56076/#KxMeq5DOIrJbxIOo.99

NORM PATTIS ADDRESSES THE REALITY OF HOW OUTRAGED FAMILY COURT VICTIMS ARE!

ATTORNEY NORM PATTIS SPEAKS OUT AS FOLLOWS IN THE CT LAW TRIBUNE:

"Criminal sentencings are a decidedly dismal affair, but rarely do they frighten me. The sentencing of Edward "Ted" Taupier in Middletown the other day did scare me. I had the sense that the center really did not hold any longer, and that warring worlds had converged without hope of doing anything other than colliding.

I attended the sentencing because I have been retained to take an appeal in Taupier's case. After a court trial, he was convicted of threatening and related offenses.

The underlying facts were essentially undisputed: Taupier sent an email to several others in which he described the physical layout of a judge's home, the distance from her bedroom window to a vantage point from which a sniper's shot could be fired, the type of weapon and ammunition it would take to penetrate the bedroom window, and the fact that he possessed such a weapon..."

Read more: 

http://www.ctlawtribune.com/id=1202747422170/Norm-Pattis-Family-Court-Rage-Revealed-in-Ugly-Email-About-Judge#ixzz3xoTnTFhr

GO FUND ME ACCOUNT NOW OPEN, FUNDRAISER IN SUPPORT OF TED TAUPIER!

"Ted is home on Appellate Bond, but the Court has imposed unreasonable restrictions on him, and he is unable to support himself and his children. He may very well lose his home, due to an inability to pay the mortgage. Please help if you can!"

To assist Ted, please click on the link below:

THE LINK APPARENTLY DOESN'T WORK!  I'M NOT SURE WHAT'S UP.  KEEP CHECKING BACK AND AS SOON AS I HAVE SOME MORE INFO I'LL LET YOU KNOW.

PERMANENT COMMISSION ON STATUS OF WOMEN IN CT IDENTIFIES PATTERN OF GENDER DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN: SEX WORKERS MORE THAN TWICE AS LIKELY TO BE ARRESTED THAN BUYERS OF SEX!

FEROZE DHANOA OF THE AVON PATCH REPORTS AS FOLLOWS:

"Sex workers in Connecticut are more than twice as likely as buyers of sex to be arrested, according to an analysis conducted by the Permanent Commission on the Status of Women (PCSW). 

The organization reports that the pattern of arrests and convictions for prostitution in nearly every Connecticut municipality may indicate the presence of systemic sexism in how sex workers are viewed and treated. The analysis is based on an annual report released by the Trafficking in Persons Council (TIPC). 

Data for the past decade shows 1,841 prostitution convictions versus 269 convictions for buying sex. When it comes to arrests, 3,557 prostitutes were arrested compared to 1,378 buyers of sex over the past ten years, according to the PCSW. While the data is not broken down by gender, the PCSW says it can be safely assumed that most prostitutes are women..."

READ MORE:

http://patch.com/connecticut/avon/s/fjx3p/in-ct-prostitutes-twice-as-likely-to-be-arrested-as-buyers-of-sex-report?utm_source=article-mostrecent&utm_medium=rss&utm_term=politics%20&%20government&utm_campaign=recirc&utm_content=aol

TED TAUPIER TELLS HIS STORY!

The Saga As Told By Ted Taupier

(Currently Incarcerated at HCC)

"This saga all started the Day 22 August 2014, when the Judge in my divorce case and her Clerk accepted the filing of an illegal motion.  The Motions that was illegal was eventually thrown out but not before a hearing was scheduled to hear the illegal ex-parte order of contempt.  Why was the clerk, the Judge and the Lawyer never sanctioned?  This is their game and they make the rules, the attorney was grievanced and the CT Bar threw out the charges of misconduct to which in the this trial she openly admitted to knowingly submitting and illegal order. 

When inherent fundamental rights clash with the immediate Family Court power structure, those common law rights are the first to fall. Under the direction of corrupt institutions the ideal of inalienable rights becomes a misnomer—since the structures in place have the immediate power to deny you those rights, they are no longer inalienable by instant circumstance.

And so it is with the family courts. Although they co-exist in a land where federal constitutional rights abound, and where such rights are legally controlling, these courts routinely ignore them. The federal “inalienable” right to parent one’s child is barely ever mentioned or entertained..."

READ MORE:

http://www.inmiddletownwetrust.blogspot.com/2016/01/from-behind-wall-saga-told-by-ted.html#comment-form

HARTFORD COURANT REPORTS CT COUPLE CHALLENGES DCF DECISION TO REMOVE THEIR CHILDREN AT BIRTH!

According to Josh Kovner, reporter at The Hartford Courant:

"NEW YORK — The state child protection agency trampled on the rights of a Connecticut couple by removing two children at birth based on "perceptions and stereotypes" of the parents' mental health, a lawyer told a federal appeals court Thursday.

Lawyer Andrew O'Toole of Hartford was arguing on behalf of Joseph Watley, 61, and Karin Hasemann, 47, who claim that their rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act were violated when the state Department of Children and Families terminated their parental rights.

O'Toole and the couple, along with several supporters, were at the U.S. 2nd Circut Court of Appeals to challenge a dismissal of the couple's case by U.S. District Judge Robert N. Chatigny..."

For more on this article, see below:

http://www.courant.com/news/connecticut/hc-dcf-predictive-neglect-appeal-0115-20160114-story.html